对话存在主义:文学伦理学批评视阈中的自由选择与伦理责任

发布时间：2018-05-09 02:06

  本文选题：文学伦理学批评 + 存在主义　； 参考：《外国文学研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：萨特存在主义哲学从一开始就有一种伦理的向度,它和文学伦理学批评一样关心文学和社会中的道德问题,因此两者之间存在对话的可能。由于萨特把自我想象成一种绝对孤独的存在,这导致他把自我的本真性而非伦理责任视为自我选择的道德依据,并把人在选择前的伦理考量视为逃避自由的自欺。而文学伦理学批评认为,自由不是一种纯粹的主观价值,因为自我只有意识到其他道德主体的需求,才最能感受到自由的价值。伦理选择的核心问题就是自我与他人的关系问题,这种关系不仅意味着相互的责任,也意味着对彼此的理解、同情和包容。文学伦理学批评并不把人的伦理身份和责任看作对自由的限制,这是对人的真实存在条件的深刻把握,并把人的自由内涵提升到一个新高度。
[Abstract]:Sartre's existentialist philosophy has an ethical dimension from the beginning. It is as concerned with the moral issues in literature and society as literary ethical criticism, so there is a possibility of dialogue between the two. Because Sartre imagines the self as a kind of absolute loneliness, this leads him to regard the true nature of the self rather than the ethical responsibility as the moral basis of his own choice, and to regard the ethical considerations before the choice as the self-deception to escape freedom. The literary ethics criticism holds that freedom is not a pure subjective value because the ego can feel the value of freedom most only if it is aware of the needs of other moral subjects. The core issue of ethical choice is the relationship between self and others, which means not only mutual responsibility, but also mutual understanding, sympathy and tolerance. Literary ethics criticism does not regard human's ethical identity and responsibility as the restriction of freedom, which is a profound grasp of the real conditions of human existence, and elevates the connotation of human freedom to a new height.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学外国语学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“文学伦理学批评:理论建构与批评实践研究”【项目批号:13&ZD128】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I06
，

本文编号：1864077