当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文艺评论论文 >

克塞诺法尼斯残篇研究:汉译及义疏

发布时间:2018-05-12 10:17

  本文选题:克塞诺法尼斯 + 莱舍 ; 参考:《西南交通大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:克塞诺法尼斯是古希腊思想史上由诗教传统转向哲学传统的关键人物,深入认识克塞诺法尼斯现存的一百一十八行诗歌不但对理解古希腊思想史有着重要的意义,甚至对于理解欧美文化中的某些方面都极其重要,如对哲学是在批判诗教传统的基础上建立起来的,知识观念的确立,一神论与多神论的原始冲突等问题的把握,都在克塞诺法尼斯那里有不同程度的反映。本文分为翻译和义疏两大部分,第一部分翻译包括莱舍《科洛封的克塞诺法尼斯残篇——文本、翻译及评注》一书中克塞诺法尼斯残篇的注释和阐释部分的汉译本和克塞诺法尼斯残篇古希腊原文的汉译本;义疏部分是建立在对克塞诺法尼斯残篇原文的翻译之上进行的,试图通过详细解读克塞诺法尼斯的残篇,深入理解文本所涉及的各种基本问题。且根据作品本身所呈现的主题将其残篇分为道德观、神论、论自然和认识论四个部分。克塞诺法尼斯的学说主要是以神以及与神相关的问题作为主题研究的,因此,道德观、论自然、认识论这三个主题都与神论有着密不可分的联系。他批判人类把自己的可耻行为加注在神身上,这不仅仅是对传统神话的批判,更多是告诉听众们传统神话中错误的道德观。这些都与克塞诺法尼斯道德有关残篇的主张不谋而合;他还从认识论的角度提出人对神的认识问题;他认为他的新神掌握着真理,但这个新神并没有告诉人类真理是什么,克塞诺法尼斯认为人类是通过探索一步一步无限接近真理的。另外,克塞诺法尼斯在论述自然现象时也是建立在批判传统神话的基础上的,他是通过谈论自然现象从而抨击传统神话的。克塞诺法尼斯这样做正是在教育他的听众们应该摆脱传统神话禁锢,进而对自然现象有一个正确的认识。
[Abstract]:Kessenovannis is the key figure in the history of ancient Greek thought from the tradition of poetry to the tradition of philosophy. It is not only of great significance to understand the history of ancient Greek thought to deeply understand the existing 118 lines of poetry, but also to understand the history of ancient Greek thought. It is even extremely important to understand certain aspects of European and American culture, such as the establishment of philosophy on the basis of criticizing the tradition of poetry and teaching, the establishment of knowledge concepts, the primitive conflict between monotheism and polytheism, and so on. There are varying degrees of reflection in Kessenofannis. This thesis is divided into two parts: translation and semantic translation. The first part of translation includes Kessenofanis' residual text by Lech Krovonne. "Translation and commentary." A Chinese translation of the annotated and interpreted parts of the remnant passage of Kessenofannis and a Chinese translation of the original Greek text of the remnant of Kessenovannis; the meaning and thinning part is based on the translation of the original text of the remnant text of the Cessenofacannis. This paper attempts to understand the basic problems involved in the text by interpreting the remains of Kessenovannis in detail. According to the theme of the work itself, it is divided into four parts: morality, theology, nature and epistemology. Kessenofannis' theory mainly focuses on God and the problems related to God. Therefore, the three themes of morality, theory of nature and epistemology are closely related to theology. He criticized mankind for placing his shameful behavior on God, which was not only a critique of traditional mythology, but also a misconception of morality in traditional mythology. It all coincides with the idea of a broken piece of Kessenovannis' morality; he also raises the question of man's understanding of God from an epistemological point of view; he thinks that his new god holds the truth, but the new god does not tell mankind what the truth is, Kessenovannis believes that human beings are infinitely close to the truth by exploring one step at a time. In addition, Kessenofannis is also based on criticizing traditional mythology when he discusses natural phenomena. He criticizes traditional myths by talking about natural phenomena. By doing so, Kessenovannis is educating his listeners to get rid of traditional mythology and to have a correct understanding of natural phenomena.
【学位授予单位】:西南交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H791.1;I046


本文编号:1878207

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/1878207.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f3183***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com