“文学与图像关系”视野下的“形象思维”问题重估

发布时间：2018-06-11 21:53

本文选题：文学与图像 + 形象思维　；参考：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：作为诗学历史上重要的理论范畴,形象思维能够对当前复杂的“文学与图像关系”作出某些合理的解释,值得学界开展重估。在新世纪之初关涉“文学危机”的文化研究看来,图像较之文学的优势在于更加“经济”地认识世界,实际上这与“形象思维”所标榜的“节省智力”别无二致。但是文学并非为了节省智力,俄国形式主义就曾率先由此发难。通过梳理陌生化对形象思维的批判可以发现,什克洛夫斯基虽然只道出了语象的“不可见”与“不在场”,但同时也隐藏着视觉中心主义的基本观念,即图像的“可见”和“在场”。因此,再现客体所呈现出的可见形象与“在场”假象决定了“眼见为实”的表意原则,这当是“图像时代”普遍的“形象思维”规律,以及文学图像化之势愈演愈烈的根本原因。
[Abstract]:As an important theoretical category in the history of poetics, image thinking can give some reasonable explanations to the complicated relationship between literature and image, which is worthy of reassessment. At the beginning of the new century, it seems that the advantage of image over literature is to understand the world more economically. In fact, this is the same as "saving intelligence" proclaimed by "image thinking". But literature was not meant to save intelligence, and Russian formalism was the first to attack it. Through combing the strangeness of the critique of image thinking, it can be found that although Shklovsky only said "invisible" and "not present" of linguistic images, he also concealed the basic concept of visual centralism. That is, the visible and present of the image. Therefore, the visible image presented by the reproducing object and the false appearance of "presence" determine the ideographic principle of "seeing as the truth", which should be the universal law of "image thinking" in the "image age". And the basic reason that the trend of literature image becomes more and more intense.
【作者单位】：江苏第二师范学院文学院;
【分类号】：I02

【相似文献】