从语言到话语——当代文学批评外转的机理研究
发布时间:2018-08-18 08:48
【摘要】:20世纪文学批评出现了"由内而外"的转向,即从对文本结构、形式的追求转向对文本所表现的社会、历史的揭示。这种外转与语言学理论从语言到话语的转变密切相关。在这一过程中,形式主义文论运用语言学模式分析知识构成,形成"语言的牢笼",语言与社会现实的关系被阻隔。福柯则积极推进话语的分析,揭露话语实践对知识、政治的控制,导致话语模式具有生产意义、表征权力运作的强大力量。今天,文学批评已不再仅仅停留于单一的文本分析,它已经成为跨学科的产物,具有泛文化的倾向。
[Abstract]:In the 20th century, literary criticism has turned from "from inside to outside", that is, from the pursuit of text structure and form to the social and historical revelation of text. This extrapolation is closely related to the transformation of linguistic theories from language to discourse. In this process, formalist literary theory uses linguistic models to analyze the composition of knowledge and form a "cage of language", and the relationship between language and social reality is blocked. Foucault actively promoted discourse analysis, exposing the control of discourse practice on knowledge and politics, which led to the productive significance of discourse mode and the powerful power of power operation. Today, literary criticism is no longer just a single text analysis, it has become an interdisciplinary product, with a pan-cultural tendency.
【作者单位】: 盐城工学院人文社会科学学院;
【分类号】:I06
本文编号:2188969
[Abstract]:In the 20th century, literary criticism has turned from "from inside to outside", that is, from the pursuit of text structure and form to the social and historical revelation of text. This extrapolation is closely related to the transformation of linguistic theories from language to discourse. In this process, formalist literary theory uses linguistic models to analyze the composition of knowledge and form a "cage of language", and the relationship between language and social reality is blocked. Foucault actively promoted discourse analysis, exposing the control of discourse practice on knowledge and politics, which led to the productive significance of discourse mode and the powerful power of power operation. Today, literary criticism is no longer just a single text analysis, it has become an interdisciplinary product, with a pan-cultural tendency.
【作者单位】: 盐城工学院人文社会科学学院;
【分类号】:I06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘全江;方法论与中国现当代文学批评[J];呼伦贝尔学院学报;2000年04期
2 赖大仁;当代文学批评形态重构:必要与可能[J];文艺评论;2001年01期
3 赖大仁;;当代文学批评价值观的嬗变与建构[J];中州学刊;2013年03期
4 赖大仁;当代文学批评形态重构:必要与可能[J];江西教育学院学报(社会科学);2000年02期
5 林舟;大众传播与当代文学批评的空间构成[J];南方文坛;2004年04期
6 饶先来;;当代文学批评的缺失[J];理论与创作;2006年03期
7 饶先来;;当代文学批评在原创性理论建构中的应有功能[J];湘南学院学报;2006年04期
8 赵永刚;;当代文学批评的语言学转向及动态研究[J];文艺理论与批评;2008年06期
9 王学胜;;当代文学批评绝境化论调质疑[J];求索;2012年09期
10 王鸿生;中国当代文学批评观念之衍变[J];文艺评论;1987年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 本报记者 郑逸文;学界争论:当代文学批评新路向[N];文汇报;2003年
2 张学昕;当代文学批评的民族立场[N];人民日报;2001年
3 张不代;“敬神”与“惹鬼”[N];文艺报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 蓝爱国;当代文学批评:多维视野中的身份意识[D];中南大学;2005年
,本文编号:2188969
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2188969.html