卡西尔艺术论研究
发布时间:2018-08-19 15:42
【摘要】: 恩斯特·卡西尔(Ernst Cassirer 1874—1945年)作为二十世纪一位伟大的哲学家、美学家,其思想博大而精深。后人对他的研究颇多,我国很多学者也从各个不同视角对他的思想进行了评述和研究。本文主要通过对卡西尔艺术论进行梳理和深入研究,以求对其艺术论有个系统的建构和认识。全文共分为三章: 第一章:概述卡西尔艺术论的哲学基础——人类文化符号哲学。 第二章:具体论述卡西尔的艺术思想。卡西尔认为神话不仅在时间上最早出现,而且是所有文化符号形成的源头,因此,艺术也起源于神话。虽然艺术在发展过程中逐渐摆脱了神话的束缚,确立了独立自主的地位,但是在艺术中始终蕴含着神话的因子。既然艺术成为了独立的文化符号,它也应该有自己的本质。在论述艺术本质之前,卡西尔首先批判了传统的一些理论派别关于艺术本质的论断,诸如模仿说、情感表现说等。同时,他也把这些理论中的合理性因素融入了自己的理论之中。卡西尔认为在艺术中积极多样的动态的情感和想象都不可缺少,但是只有情感和想象还不能称之为真正的艺术,情感和想象都必须要赋予外形。构形是艺术本质的中心。所以可以将卡西尔的艺术本质论归纳为动态生命情感的形式化。卡西尔非常强调艺术强化照亮人类心智之自由的审美教育价值功能。从某种程度上说,艺术功能也能够深化艺术本质。在这章中,还论述了艺术发展的内在动力,卡西尔认为艺术之所以能够发展,在于其内部传统力量与创新力量之间的矛盾冲突斗争,正是这两种力量辩证的对立斗争推动着艺术的发展。 第三章:通过对卡西尔艺术论的研究论述,挖掘其艺术论思想所蕴涵的合理价值,同时对其艺术论思想中所存在的局限和不足进行辩证地分析。卡西尔艺术论思想的价值在于肯定了艺术的主体性、强调了艺术中的能动性作用、努力坚持感性与理性的辨证统一等方面。局限与不足主要包括其思想的先验唯心性、忽视了物质生产活动在艺术中的作用、过于强调艺术的形式,有形式主义的倾向等方面。
[Abstract]:Ernst Cassier (Ernst Cassirer 1874-1945) as a great philosopher and esthetician in the 20th century, his thoughts are broad and profound. Many scholars in China have commented and studied his thoughts from different perspectives. In this paper, Cassier's art theory is combed and deeply studied in order to have a systematic construction and understanding of its art theory. The thesis is divided into three chapters: chapter one: the philosophical basis of Cassier's art theory-philosophy of human cultural symbols. Chapter two: expound Cassier's artistic thought in detail. According to Cassier, mythology is not only the earliest time, but also the source of all cultural symbols. Therefore, art also originated from mythology. Although art gradually gets rid of the shackles of mythology and establishes its independent position in the process of development, it always contains the factor of mythology. Since art has become an independent cultural symbol, it should also have its own essence. Before discussing the essence of art, Cassirer first criticizes some traditional theories about the essence of art, such as imitation theory, emotional expression theory, etc. At the same time, he also incorporated the rationality of these theories into his own theory. Cassier believes that active and dynamic emotion and imagination in art are indispensable, but only emotion and imagination can not be called true art, emotion and imagination must be endowed with shape. Configuration is the center of artistic essence. Therefore, Cassier's theory of artistic essence can be summed up as the formalization of dynamic life emotion. Cassier emphasizes the value function of aesthetic education which illuminates the freedom of human mind. To some extent, the function of art can also deepen the essence of art. In this chapter, the author also discusses the internal motive force of art development. Cassier thinks that the reason why art can develop lies in the contradiction and conflict between its internal traditional forces and innovative forces. It is these two forces dialectical antagonistic struggle that drives the development of art. Chapter three: through the research and discussion of Cassier's art theory, the author excavates the reasonable value of his art theory thought, and dialectically analyzes the limitation and deficiency in his art theory thought. The value of Cassier's theory of art lies in affirming the subjectivity of art, emphasizing the role of initiative in art, and striving to insist on the dialectical unity of sensibility and rationality. The limitation and deficiency mainly include the transcendental idealism of his thought, neglecting the function of material production activity in art, emphasizing the form of art too much, the tendency of formalism and so on.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:J0
本文编号:2192107
[Abstract]:Ernst Cassier (Ernst Cassirer 1874-1945) as a great philosopher and esthetician in the 20th century, his thoughts are broad and profound. Many scholars in China have commented and studied his thoughts from different perspectives. In this paper, Cassier's art theory is combed and deeply studied in order to have a systematic construction and understanding of its art theory. The thesis is divided into three chapters: chapter one: the philosophical basis of Cassier's art theory-philosophy of human cultural symbols. Chapter two: expound Cassier's artistic thought in detail. According to Cassier, mythology is not only the earliest time, but also the source of all cultural symbols. Therefore, art also originated from mythology. Although art gradually gets rid of the shackles of mythology and establishes its independent position in the process of development, it always contains the factor of mythology. Since art has become an independent cultural symbol, it should also have its own essence. Before discussing the essence of art, Cassirer first criticizes some traditional theories about the essence of art, such as imitation theory, emotional expression theory, etc. At the same time, he also incorporated the rationality of these theories into his own theory. Cassier believes that active and dynamic emotion and imagination in art are indispensable, but only emotion and imagination can not be called true art, emotion and imagination must be endowed with shape. Configuration is the center of artistic essence. Therefore, Cassier's theory of artistic essence can be summed up as the formalization of dynamic life emotion. Cassier emphasizes the value function of aesthetic education which illuminates the freedom of human mind. To some extent, the function of art can also deepen the essence of art. In this chapter, the author also discusses the internal motive force of art development. Cassier thinks that the reason why art can develop lies in the contradiction and conflict between its internal traditional forces and innovative forces. It is these two forces dialectical antagonistic struggle that drives the development of art. Chapter three: through the research and discussion of Cassier's art theory, the author excavates the reasonable value of his art theory thought, and dialectically analyzes the limitation and deficiency in his art theory thought. The value of Cassier's theory of art lies in affirming the subjectivity of art, emphasizing the role of initiative in art, and striving to insist on the dialectical unity of sensibility and rationality. The limitation and deficiency mainly include the transcendental idealism of his thought, neglecting the function of material production activity in art, emphasizing the form of art too much, the tendency of formalism and so on.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:J0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡友峰,何正国;卡西尔艺术哲学引论[J];安徽教育学院学报;2004年05期
2 李社教;从康德的“理性批判”到卡西尔的“文化寻根”[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年04期
3 董希文;符号论美学的艺术创造理论[J];江西社会科学;2002年04期
4 张伟;文化哲学与艺术分析──卡西尔的艺术文化观[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1997年06期
5 白春雨;符号之网——浅析卡西尔的《人论》[J];理论界;2002年03期
6 胡友峰;;对形式的重新发现——论卡西尔的符号:形式美学[J];兰州学刊;2005年06期
7 谢冬冰;艺术中的直觉抽象——朗格、卡西尔的抽象论[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
8 张玉能;;符号形式的创造与符号诗学[J];青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
9 李欣人;符号论艺术观哲学基础探赜[J];山东社会科学;2005年08期
10 刘炬航;林影;;艺术的认知功能与形式创造——卡西尔艺术哲学评析[J];上饶师范学院学报;2008年02期
,本文编号:2192107
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2192107.html