试论作者意图与阐释标准
发布时间：2018-09-15 18:56
【摘要】：自新批评以来,历经结构主义和后结构主义思潮冲击,作者"意图"在文本阐释中的重要性早已今非昔比。在西方文论关于这个概念的论争似乎已告一段落之际,张江先生重提作者"意图"可以看作对其前期提出的"强制阐释"论的继续和深化,他希望这个概念可以成为文本阐释合理疆域划分的一个标准。但文章却对此存疑,我们认为张江先生对作者意图的界定仍带有一定的西方传统理性主体特点,如此界定的这个概念并不能对新批评和结构主义等学派的质疑构成有效回应。文章将从作者"意图"的定义、其与阐释过程的关系以及其作为阐释标准的可行性三个方面论证这个概念对文学批评指导作用的有限性。
[Abstract]:Since the new criticism, with the impact of structuralism and post-structuralism, the significance of the author's intention in the interpretation of the text has long been different. At a time when the debate on this concept in western literary theory seems to have come to an end, Mr. Zhang Jiang's restatement of the author's "intention" can be seen as the continuation and deepening of his earlier "compulsory interpretation" theory. He hopes that this concept can be used as a standard for the text to explain the rational division of territory. However, there is doubt in the article. We think that Mr. Zhang Jiang's definition of the author's intention still has certain characteristics of the western traditional rational subject, and this concept can not effectively respond to the doubts of the new criticism and structuralism. This paper will demonstrate the limitation of the concept to the guidance of literary criticism from three aspects: the definition of the author's intention, its relationship with the process of interpretation and its feasibility as a standard of interpretation.
【作者单位】： 上海外国语大学英语学院;
【分类号】：I06
本文编号：2244188
[Abstract]:Since the new criticism, with the impact of structuralism and post-structuralism, the significance of the author's intention in the interpretation of the text has long been different. At a time when the debate on this concept in western literary theory seems to have come to an end, Mr. Zhang Jiang's restatement of the author's "intention" can be seen as the continuation and deepening of his earlier "compulsory interpretation" theory. He hopes that this concept can be used as a standard for the text to explain the rational division of territory. However, there is doubt in the article. We think that Mr. Zhang Jiang's definition of the author's intention still has certain characteristics of the western traditional rational subject, and this concept can not effectively respond to the doubts of the new criticism and structuralism. This paper will demonstrate the limitation of the concept to the guidance of literary criticism from three aspects: the definition of the author's intention, its relationship with the process of interpretation and its feasibility as a standard of interpretation.
【作者单位】： 上海外国语大学英语学院;
【分类号】：I06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 庞弘;;从“心灵共鸣”到“反对理论”——作者意图理论的三条路径[J];国外文学;2013年01期
2 庞弘;;作者意图重构与“客观性”追问——赫施意图论解释学的语境维度[J];北方论丛;2013年04期
3 灻承元;庞璃;;作者意图理论再探[J];甘肃社会科学;2008年05期
4 方克平;熊焕平;;隐微理论与作者意图批评理论[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2008年06期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 赵巍;;版本差别与作者意图——《红楼梦》“抄检大观园”的英译本比较研究[A];中国英汉语比较研究会第八次全国学术研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2008年
，本文编号：2244188
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2244188.html
