阐释的“界”线——从盲人摸象谈起
发布时间：2019-05-16 10:36
【摘要】：正近读张江教授《开放与封闭——阐释的边界讨论之一》一文,受益匪浅,思考良多。文章从意大利著名理论家和小说家安贝托·艾柯的两部著作《开放的作品》《诠释与过度诠释》的分析入手,通过两种截然相反的观点在艾柯一个人身上的表现,试图在文本阐释的开放与封闭之间找到可以合理对接点。虽然张江教授在该文的最末处,谈到他的主张是"文本是自在的,不能否认文本自身所蕴含的有限的确定意义;文本是开放
[Abstract]:I am close to reading Professor Zhang Jiang's "Open and closed-one of the Boundary discussions of interpretation", which benefits a lot and thinks a lot. This paper starts with the analysis of two books, "Open works" and "over-interpretation" by Anberto Ike, a famous Italian theorist and novelist, and expresses them in one person through two diametrically opposite views. The article starts with the analysis of the two works of "Open works" and "over-interpretation" by Anberto Ike, a famous Italian theorist and novelist. This paper tries to find a reasonable contact between the openness and closure of text interpretation. Although Professor Zhang Jiang said at the end of the article that his argument is that "the text is free and cannot deny the limited definite meaning contained in the text itself; the text is open."
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：I06
本文编号：2478230
[Abstract]:I am close to reading Professor Zhang Jiang's "Open and closed-one of the Boundary discussions of interpretation", which benefits a lot and thinks a lot. This paper starts with the analysis of two books, "Open works" and "over-interpretation" by Anberto Ike, a famous Italian theorist and novelist, and expresses them in one person through two diametrically opposite views. The article starts with the analysis of the two works of "Open works" and "over-interpretation" by Anberto Ike, a famous Italian theorist and novelist. This paper tries to find a reasonable contact between the openness and closure of text interpretation. Although Professor Zhang Jiang said at the end of the article that his argument is that "the text is free and cannot deny the limited definite meaning contained in the text itself; the text is open."
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：I06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 雯清;;2008大型公共艺术活动展现场张江[J];浦东开发;2008年10期
2 田时纲;;《美的历史》中译本错漏百出——从“目录”和“导论”看译者对艾柯的偏离[J];文艺研究;2008年03期
3 朱寿兴;;艾柯的“过度诠释”在文学解读活动中并不存在[J];湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
4 张静;;文本的游戏——论艾柯的阐释哲学[J];语文学刊;2013年16期
5 陈定家;;超文本与“书的未来”[J];中国中外文艺理论研究;2012年00期
6 南帆;诠释与历史语境[J];读书;1998年11期
7 ;异样的寻丑之旅[J];中国图书评论;2011年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 本报记者 杨琳;“公共艺术在张江”要创造诗意园区[N];上海证券报;2007年
2 杨吟;张江进行式[N];经济观察报;2006年
3 赵 勇;读艾柯《书的未来》[N];学习时报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王燕;艾柯的文本诠释理论研究[D];山东大学;2012年
2 唐诗;无限的意义，，有限的诠释[D];内蒙古大学;2014年
3 陆姗姗;文学翻译中意义的辩证诠释[D];上海外国语大学;2012年
本文编号：2478230
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2478230.html
