中西诗学对话——德里达与中国文化

发布时间：2019-05-27 15:05

【摘要】：随着中国特色学术话语建设的不断推进,学术界对于中西诗学对话的愿望越发强烈。而"对话"不仅要乐于对话,更要有话可对。德里达作为解构大师,其颠覆语音中心主义的理论主张,与中国汉字"一音多字""一字多音""一字多义"等特征不谋而合。更进一步,德里达利用"延异"挑战"言语"符号作为外在"真理"的权威性,发现不存在纯粹的真理,这与中国文化的"言意之辨""言不尽意"等有异曲同工之妙。此外,德里达虽然为"元书写"赋予"意义之源"的美名,却使其无法"言传"。而中国文化通过"立象尽意""以象破象"等"达意"方式苦寻"真意",对于德式解构亦是补充。不可否认,德里达解构理论与中国文化的相通与相异成为彼此平等对话的前提,而对话的最终目的在于互惠互利。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of academic discourse construction with Chinese characteristics, the academic circles have a stronger desire for the dialogue between Chinese and Western poetics. And "dialogue" should not only be happy to talk, but also have something to say. As a master of deconstructing, Derrida's theory of subverting phonetic centralism coincides with the characteristics of Chinese characters such as "one-tone multi-character", "one-word polyphonic" and "polysemy". Furthermore, Derrida used the symbol of "extension" to challenge "speech" as the authority of external "truth" and found that there was no pure truth, which was similar to the "distinction between words and meanings" and "inexhaustible meaning" in Chinese culture. In addition, although Derrida gave "the source of meaning" to the "Yuan Writing", it could not be "transmitted". The Chinese culture strives for the "true meaning" through the way of "making the image full of the mind" and "breaking the elephant" and so on, which is also a supplement to the German Deconstruction. the "true meaning" of the Chinese culture is also supplemented by the German Deconstructuration. It is undeniable that the connection and difference between Derrida's deconstructing theory and Chinese culture become the premise of equal dialogue with each other, and the ultimate purpose of dialogue is mutual benefit.
【作者单位】：四川大学文学与新闻学院;
【分类号】：I0-03

【相似文献】