探索童话的游戏精神—彼得·潘与孙悟空顽童形象比较研究
发布时间：2022-04-18 20:58
本文运用诺斯罗普·弗莱的神话原型批评方法中的文学人物分类法，对彼得·潘和孙悟空两位顽童人物代表进行纵向贯通和横向比较。多年来，文学中的顽童形象很少受到学者与读者的关注。本文从发生、情节、主题、人物形象和叙事的角度，通过对两位顽童的比较研究旨在重新唤起人们对顽童形象的核心“游戏精神”的思考。全文总共分为五部分。第一章，首先介绍了J.M.巴里和吴承恩两部著作的创作背景，同时简要介绍了国内外对彼得·潘与孙悟空的人物研究状况，引出两者比较的可能性。第二章，文章分析了中西文化背景下“儿童观”的主流形态，以及在游戏精神关照下，中西文学作品中顽童形象所具有的不同特质与游戏特征。第三章，论文分详细阐述了彼得·潘和孙悟空在弗莱的文学人物分类下所进行的比较研究。弗莱在他的神话原型批评理论中以英雄能量大小为标准将文学人物分为神邸、浪漫主义英雄、悲剧英雄、普通人以及讽刺英雄。英雄能量大小是相对于人类本身具有能量的高低而言提出的，分别体现在五种模仿模式中：神话模式，浪漫模式，高模仿模式，低级浪漫模式和讽刺模式。作为中西顽童形象代表，彼得·潘和孙悟空具有五种文学人物的共同特性，分别从神邸、冒险家、悲剧英雄、纯顽童...
【文章页数】：69 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements Abstract 摘要 Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Peter Pan and Monkey King－Two Maestros’ Encounter
1.2 Research Background
1.3 Possibility and Significance of Comparison Chapter Two Naughty BoysViewed under the Spirit of Game
2.1 Mainstream Attitudes towards Children
2.2 Natural Literary Form of Spirit of Game－Naughty Boys
2.2.1 Secret of Spirit of Game
2.2.2 Identity of Literary Naughty Boys Chapter Three A Multifaceted Comparison of Peter Pan and Monkey King
3.1 Frye’s Archetypal Theory
3.1.1 Differences between Jung and Frye’s Archetypal Theories
3.1.2 Categorization of Literary Characters
3.2 The Divine Beings－Origins of the Two Naughty Boys
3.2.1 Peter Pan and the Greek Mythologies
3.2.2 Monkey King and Eastern Ancient Mythologies
3.2.3 A Cross-cultural Summon of Mythologies
3.3 The Romantic Heroes－Maximized Reveal of Naughty Boys
3.3.1 Orientations of Two Adventurers－Search for Protagonists
3.3.2 Maps to Ultimate Sublimation of Audacious Adventurers
3.3.3 Mighty Monster-Killers－from Weapon to Mode of Victory
3.3.4 The Fairytale Logic of the Secondary World
3.4 Anti-Authority Tragic Heroes－Avengers or Victims
3.4.1 Tragic Heroes in Frye’s six Phases of Tragedy
3.4.2 Tragic Codes of Avengers and Victims
3.4.3 Tacit and Explicit Rebellion of Peter Pan and Monkey King
3.5 Naughty Boys with Common Gaiety
3.5.1 An Introduction to Theory of Carnival
3.5.2 Peter Pan and Monkey King’s Pure Delight
3.6 Satiric Heroes－Clowns under the Suppression of Religion
3.6.1 Frye’s Satiric Hero
3.6.2 Peter Pan and Calvinism
3.6.3 Monkey King and Unity of Three Religions Chapter Four A Further Analysis of Similarities and Differences
4.1 Similarities of the Two Naughty Boys
4.2 Differences between the Two Characters
4.2.1 Utopian and Dystopian
4.2.2 Childhood and Adulthood
4.2.3 Humanism and Feudalism Chapter Five Conclusion
5.1 Summary of Major Findings
5.2 Limitations of the Research
5.3 Suggestions for Future Portrayal Bibliography 发表论文和科研情况说明
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]论《彼得·潘》的叙事话语[J]. 王昀. 作家. 2008(08)
[2]从托尔金的童话文学观看《西游记》的童话性[J]. 舒伟. 重庆社会科学. 2007(02)
[3]林格伦儿童文学的经典性与现代性[J]. 张瑷. 外国文学研究. 2004(02)
[4]童话里的原始思维质态[J]. 吴文艳. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2001(04)
博士论文
[1]纯真并快乐着[D]. 徐韵.南京师范大学 2005
本文编号：3646355
【文章页数】：69 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements Abstract 摘要 Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Peter Pan and Monkey King－Two Maestros’ Encounter
1.2 Research Background
1.3 Possibility and Significance of Comparison Chapter Two Naughty BoysViewed under the Spirit of Game
2.1 Mainstream Attitudes towards Children
2.2 Natural Literary Form of Spirit of Game－Naughty Boys
2.2.1 Secret of Spirit of Game
2.2.2 Identity of Literary Naughty Boys Chapter Three A Multifaceted Comparison of Peter Pan and Monkey King
3.1 Frye’s Archetypal Theory
3.1.1 Differences between Jung and Frye’s Archetypal Theories
3.1.2 Categorization of Literary Characters
3.2 The Divine Beings－Origins of the Two Naughty Boys
3.2.1 Peter Pan and the Greek Mythologies
3.2.2 Monkey King and Eastern Ancient Mythologies
3.2.3 A Cross-cultural Summon of Mythologies
3.3 The Romantic Heroes－Maximized Reveal of Naughty Boys
3.3.1 Orientations of Two Adventurers－Search for Protagonists
3.3.2 Maps to Ultimate Sublimation of Audacious Adventurers
3.3.3 Mighty Monster-Killers－from Weapon to Mode of Victory
3.3.4 The Fairytale Logic of the Secondary World
3.4 Anti-Authority Tragic Heroes－Avengers or Victims
3.4.1 Tragic Heroes in Frye’s six Phases of Tragedy
3.4.2 Tragic Codes of Avengers and Victims
3.4.3 Tacit and Explicit Rebellion of Peter Pan and Monkey King
3.5 Naughty Boys with Common Gaiety
3.5.1 An Introduction to Theory of Carnival
3.5.2 Peter Pan and Monkey King’s Pure Delight
3.6 Satiric Heroes－Clowns under the Suppression of Religion
3.6.1 Frye’s Satiric Hero
3.6.2 Peter Pan and Calvinism
3.6.3 Monkey King and Unity of Three Religions Chapter Four A Further Analysis of Similarities and Differences
4.1 Similarities of the Two Naughty Boys
4.2 Differences between the Two Characters
4.2.1 Utopian and Dystopian
4.2.2 Childhood and Adulthood
4.2.3 Humanism and Feudalism Chapter Five Conclusion
5.1 Summary of Major Findings
5.2 Limitations of the Research
5.3 Suggestions for Future Portrayal Bibliography 发表论文和科研情况说明
【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]论《彼得·潘》的叙事话语[J]. 王昀. 作家. 2008(08)
[2]从托尔金的童话文学观看《西游记》的童话性[J]. 舒伟. 重庆社会科学. 2007(02)
[3]林格伦儿童文学的经典性与现代性[J]. 张瑷. 外国文学研究. 2004(02)
[4]童话里的原始思维质态[J]. 吴文艳. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2001(04)
博士论文
[1]纯真并快乐着[D]. 徐韵.南京师范大学 2005
本文编号：3646355
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/3646355.html
