契诃夫与刘震云生存状态书写比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 16:24

本文选题：契诃夫　切入点：刘震云　出处：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：生存状态书写，是指作家在作品中关注现实生活中人的生命状态和生活情状，包括人的处境和遭遇，所经受的痛苦与灾难，强调的是对人本身生存状态的关注和对生命意义和价值的思考。生存状况书写以及对人生存现状的审视和关照构成了在契诃夫和刘震云的小说的重要内容。契诃夫从日常生活中最平凡的人平凡事情入手，广泛反映现实生活，揭露社会的溃疡，征讨反动腐恶，鞭笞市侩庸俗，同时表达对新生活的憧憬和呼唤。比如讽刺官场丑态的《钉子上》、《胖子和瘦子》、《一个文官之死》，，描写沙皇俄国世态炎凉的《苦恼》，控诉沙皇黑暗统治的《第六病室》以及批判小市民庸俗气息的《约内奇》、《醋栗》等。刘震云是新时期新写实主义文学的代表作家，他的作品多取材于普通平民和基层干部的日常生活及农村生活的变迁，并以特定的视角对人的生存状态、命运、人性进行现实的观照。契诃夫是十九世纪末俄国伟大的批判现实主义大师，刘震云是中国新时期新写实主义文学的重要代表作家，尽管两者所处的时代、写作背景有很多的不同，但他们在题材的设定、人物的选择等方面，即描写平凡人的平凡生活，展示普通人的生存状态，从这个层面而言，两者之间存在着极大的相似性，本论文即是从这个角度出发，就生存状态书写展开比较研究。本论文采用平行研究的方法，首先概述契诃夫和刘震云两者的生存状态写作状况，然后从艺术阐释和现实关照两个层面展开对比分析，并进行综合探究。对生存状态的艺术阐释，主要从荒诞、真实和异化三个层面展开；论述生存状态书写的现实关照，主要从群体生存生存关照、社会批判和价值重构三个方面进行；通过具体的文本分析，比较分析契诃夫与刘震云笔下生存状态书写的异与同，引发人们对生活、生存、命运以及人个体本身的思考。
[Abstract]:The writing of living state refers to the writer's concern about the state of life and the state of life in real life in his works, including the human condition and experience, and the suffering and disaster experienced by the writer. What is emphasized is the attention to the living state of human beings and the consideration of the meaning and value of life. The writing of the living conditions and the examination and care of the present situation of human existence constitute the important contents of the novels in Chekhov and Liu Zhenyun. Chekhov began with the most mundane things of the most ordinary people in his daily life, extensively reflected real life, exposed the ulcers of society, demanded reactionary evils, and flogged the philistine vulgarity. At the same time express the hope and call for a new life. For example, sarcastic official ugly "on the nail", "fat and thin", "the death of a civil servant", describing the tsar Russia in the world of "distress", accusing the czar of the dark rule of < 6th disease. "Room" and "Jonich", "gooseberry", etc. Liu Zhenyun is the representative writer of new realism literature in the new era. Most of his works are based on the daily life of ordinary civilians and grassroots cadres and the changes of rural life, and take a realistic view of people's living state, fate and human nature from a specific angle of view. Chekhov is a great Russian critical realism master at the end of 19th century. Liu Zhenyun is an important representative writer of new realism literature in China. But they in the subject matter setting, the character choice and so on, namely describes the ordinary person's ordinary life, displays the ordinary person's survival condition, from this aspect, there is the great similarity between the two, this paper is embarks from this angle, A comparative study was carried out on the writing of living state. In this paper, the parallel research method is used to summarize the living state of Chekhov and Liu Zhenyun, and then to compare and analyze them from the two aspects of artistic interpretation and realistic care. The artistic interpretation of the state of existence is mainly carried out from three aspects of absurdity, truth and alienation, and the realistic care of the writing of the state of existence, mainly from the perspective of the survival of the group, is discussed. Through the concrete text analysis, the author compares and analyzes the differences and similarities between Chekhov and Liu Zhenyun in the writing of the living state, which causes people to think about life, survival, fate and the individual.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：I106-03

【参考文献】