一则基于《乌鸦》之谜的“推理故事”——《创作的哲学》及其诗学问题

发布时间：2018-05-08 14:06

本文选题：爱伦·坡 + 《创作的哲学》　；参考：《外国文学评论》2013年03期

【摘要】：《创作的哲学》因其明显的批评话语常被批评界视为爱伦·坡的一则"经典文论",而很少被看成一则"故事";即便偶或被个别批评家当做"故事",亦往往沦为某种元批评范式下的理论寓言,或是作者愚弄读者的一个商业计策。本文试图一方面阐述《创作的哲学》之"创作性",另一方面分析《创作的哲学》与坡的经典推理小说(尤其是《莫格街凶杀案》)之间存在的内部契合与文本呼应,并在此基础上将其诠释为一则以"《乌鸦》的‘发生'"为谜案、以诗学探讨为线索、以逻辑分析为手段的"推理故事"。同时,肯定《创作的哲学》之故事性不应以牺牲其理论性为代价,因此,本文还将对《创作的哲学》所涉及的爱伦·坡诗学的若干核心命题加以探求,并特别指出坡围绕"真"、"善"、"美"所展开的讨论绝非简单的方法论上的"一刀切",而是力图实现一种诗学的辩证平衡。
[Abstract]:"philosophy of creation", because of its obvious critical discourse, is often regarded as a "classic literary theory" by Allan Poe, but rarely as a "story"; even if occasionally or by individual critics as "a story," it is often reduced to a certain. Theoretical fables under the paradigm of metacritical criticism, Or a commercial ploy by the author to fool the reader. On the one hand, this paper attempts to expound the "creativeness" of "philosophy of creation", on the other hand, it analyzes the internal consonance between "philosophy of creation" and Poe's classical reasoning novel (especially the murder of Mog Street). On this basis, the author interprets it as a "reasoning story" with "the Crow" as a riddle, a poetics as a clue and a logical analysis as a means. At the same time, it affirms that the story of "philosophy of creation" should not be sacrificed at the expense of its theory. Therefore, this article will also explore some core propositions of Poetics of Allan Poetics involved in "philosophy of creation". It also points out that Poe's discussion around "truth", "goodness" and "beauty" is not a simple methodological "one-size-fits-all", but a dialectical balance of poetics.
【作者单位】：南京理工大学外国语学院英语系;
【分类号】：I712.072

【相似文献】