走出心灵的困境：《宠儿》和《榆树下的欲望》中杀婴行为的比较

发布时间：2018-05-09 15:15

本文选题：母亲 + 杀婴　；参考：《福建师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：托尼·莫里森和尤金·奥尼尔分别于1993年和1936年获得诺贝尔奖。这两位作家的写作风格及技巧各不相同,但是他们具有代表性的作品《宠儿》和《榆树下的欲望》却有着相同的杀婴情节。本文先分析两位母亲杀婴的原因,然后重点根据新历史主义理论解读杀婴的区别。新历史主义关注那些处于社会边缘人物的命运：这些边缘人物是迫于一种怎样的社会历史条件之下才会做出杀婴的举动?“自我形塑”和“协和策略”以及权利,巩固,颠覆和包容理论被用来分析两个母亲的杀婴行为,分别有着不同的影响和结果。既然相同的杀婴行为有决然不同的起因,影响,结果,那么隐藏在背后的真正原因是什么?两位母亲塞斯和爱碧她们最终的结局又会怎样?她们能否走出心灵的困境,勇敢地迎接光明的未来?这些都是本文要探讨的内容。
[Abstract]:Tony Morrison and Eugene O'Neill won the Nobel Prize in 1993 and 1936, respectively. The two writers have different writing styles and techniques, but their representative works "beloved" and "desire under the Elm" have the same infanticide plot. This paper first analyzes the causes of infanticide between the two mothers, and then interprets the difference between infanticide and infanticide according to the new historicism theory. New historicism is concerned about the fate of those on the fringes of society: under what social and historical conditions do these marginal figures commit infanticide? "Self-shaping" and "Concord Strategy" as well as rights, consolidation, subversion and tolerance theories are used to analyze the two mothers' infanticide, with different effects and results. Since the same infanticide behavior has a decidedly different cause, effect, and result, what is the real reason behind it? What will happen to the two mothers Seth and Abby? Can they come out of the plight of the soul, brave to meet the bright future? These are the contents of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：福建师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I712.074

【相似文献】