普鲁塔克《提秀斯传》研究

发布时间：2018-06-02 16:57

本文选题：普鲁塔克 + 《对传集》　；参考：《东北师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：普鲁塔克是一位罗马帝国初期的希腊著作家，一生经历丰富，藉其宏富的著述和思想名扬后世，据其现存著作辑合而成的《传记集》和《道德论集》，已成为传世经典，，影响深远。《提秀斯传》是普鲁塔克现存著作合集《传记集》中的一篇，属于普鲁塔克传记作品中的《对传集》系列，与《罗慕路斯传》搭配成对，为普鲁塔克所列传主之最古者。本文以《提秀斯传》为中心研究普鲁塔克，主要讨论三个方面的问题。第一，普鲁塔克传记作品研究的背景与问题介绍，即立足于现存文献记载，推测还原普鲁塔克生平；梳理普鲁塔克著作的版本流传，厘清现存著作分类的渊源和认识上的概念误区，尤其是《传记集》与《对传集》的混用；概括普鲁塔克赖以成名的传记作品《对传集》的总体特点，即作为传记体裁凸显传主性格以为效仿典范的传记特点，以及“导论”、“合论”、“对传形式”等传记结构方面的特点，从而为《提秀斯传》的研究提供整体的视域背景。第二，讨论普鲁塔克《提秀斯传》所叙传主提秀斯的历史真实性。通过现存文献资料和考古资料的概述，勾勒出历史中提秀斯形象演变的基本脉络，强调目前的资料虽能确定提秀斯确有其人，但其身份与普鲁塔克笔下作为雅典国王和城邦创立者身份的提秀斯相对立，后者的身份和真实性是后世雅典人的追述、创造和认同，这种形象的演变和其背后的现实需要是真实的。第三，分析普鲁塔克笔下的提秀斯，讨论《对传集》视域下《提秀斯传》的特点。普鲁塔克在撰写过程中基本按照时间顺序记述提秀斯，但在叙述过程中的史料运用却体现着自己的倾向，这与传记末“合论”中的评述相呼应，体现普鲁塔克传记结构的统一性；普鲁塔克承认提秀斯的故事中有许多虚妄神话成分，因而循以“求真”的态度，在记述过程中较为罕见地引述了大量史家的观点，以及月历、节庆和碑铭记载等资料以为例证，虽然其“求真”的态度体现出普鲁塔克的史家风范，也体现出《提秀斯传》有别于其他传记作品的独特之处，但普鲁塔克笔下的提秀斯并未能使人信服其历史真实性，普鲁塔克的“求真”服务于丰富传主形象、凸显传主性格以为模仿典范的目的。
[Abstract]:Plutarch was a Greek writer in the early Roman Empire, who had rich experience in his life. His works and ideas were famous for later generations. According to the collection of his extant works, Biography and moral Theory, they have become the classics of the world. The Biography of Thebes is one of Plutarch's existing collections of works, Biography, which is part of the collection of Biography of Plutarch, paired with Romulus. The oldest of Plutarch's list of preachers. This paper focuses on the study of Plutarch, and discusses three problems. First, the background and problems of Plutarch's biographical research, that is, based on the existing literature records, the author speculated that Plutarch's life was restored, and combed the versioning of Plutarch's works. To clarify the origin of the classification of existing works and the conceptual misunderstandings, especially the mixed use of Biography and Biography, and to summarize the general characteristics of Plutarch's famous biographical works, That is to say, as a biographical genre, the biographical features of the biographical character of imitating the model, as well as the characteristics of the biographical structure, such as "introduction", "combination theory", "the form of biography" and so on, can provide the overall horizon background for the study of the Biography of Tinius. Secondly, it discusses the historical authenticity of the narrator of Tyrus in Plutarch. Through an overview of the existing literature and archaeological materials, this paper outlines the basic context of the evolution of the image of Titius in history, and emphasizes that while the current data can confirm that Titius is indeed a human being, But his identity is opposite to that of Tyrus, described by Plutarch as the king of Athens and the founder of the city-state. The identity and authenticity of the latter are traced, created and identified by later Athenians. The evolution of this image and the realistic needs behind it are real. Thirdly, it analyzes the characteristics of Tyrus in Plutarch's works, and discusses the characteristics of the Biography of Tinius in the field of view. Plutarch basically wrote about Titius in chronological order, but the use of historical materials in the process of narration reflected his own tendency, which echoed the comments in the last part of the biography. The unity of Plutarch's biographical structure; Plutarch acknowledges that there are many false mythological elements in the story of Thebes, and thus, in the course of the narrative, with a "truth-seeking" attitude, makes a relatively rare reference to the views of a large number of historians, as well as to the monthly calendar. The festival and inscription records are illustrative, although his attitude of "seeking truth" reflects Plutarch's style of historiography, as well as the uniqueness of the Biography of Titius, which is different from other biographical works. However, Plutarch's Tyrus fails to convince people of its historical authenticity. Plutarch's "seeking truth" serves to enrich the image of the master and to highlight the purpose of his character as imitation of the model.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I545.075

【参考文献】