新历史主义视野中的《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》
发布时间：2019-03-12 12:31
【摘要】：《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》被公认为乔治·艾略特早期最优秀的作品之一，同时也是一部半自传体小说。小说一经出版，就被诸多评论家津津乐道。艾略特基于自己的家乡生活及其成长经历塑造其小说的主人公麦琪。诸如麦琪的童年轶事，其青少年时期的痛苦迷茫,与哥哥的兄妹之情以及她不被理解的爱情等，皆是艾略特记忆碎片的重新组合。正如作者本人一样，麦琪以其叛逆的行为被家庭和社会所放逐；因其奉行狭隘的道德观，她总是处在痛苦的深渊，因此人们往往称她是一个殉难者。然而作品结尾所隐藏的潜在的颠覆力量却往往被人们忽视。 本文试从新历史主义的角度去重新解读《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》。艾略特在《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》中记录了大量的边缘话语。本文通过艾略特记录的边缘话语和其本人的反传统经历，阐释了麦琪对主流意识和社会权威的挑战。并且基于格林布拉特的颠覆抑制说和福柯的权力说，分析了麦琪是如何受到抑制的。正是在颠覆和抑制的此消彼长中，产生了权力。正如福柯所言，权力产生颠覆并为抑制服务。 本论文分为五部分：第一章即前言，介绍艾略特的早期小说和《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》的国内外研究现状，并简单介绍了格林布拉特的颠覆抑制论和福柯的权力说。第二章探析作品中书写的“小历史”和记录的边缘话语，并介绍艾略特的人文主义与新历史主义的契合点。第三章介绍《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》中的女主人公麦琪在不同的年纪阶段所表现出来的颠覆社会主流和权威的力量，尤其是她对“家庭天使”意象的颠覆。第四章分析麦琪在其童年、青少年以及成年后的颠覆力量是如何被抑制的。结论部分指出《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》以麦琪的边缘人的声音记录小历史。尽管她在追求自己的理想时经历了艰难的抗争，但最终她的颠覆力量都受到了抑制并且带来了权力的实现。 笔者认为用新历史主义解读《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》也有其不足的一面，因为新历史主义者往往强调抑制的最终作用。但当洪水来临之际，，麦琪作为一个被家庭和社会抛弃的弱女子划船去拯救权威的象征者汤姆，麦琪的这一举动是其长期压抑后的爆发，她的死并不代表她受到了彻底的抑制。然而新历史主义者往往忽视麦琪身上所体现的这种潜在的颠覆力。
[Abstract]:The Mill on the Frost River is recognized as one of George Eliot's early best works and a semi-autobiographical novel. As soon as the novel was published, it was relished by many critics. Eliot shaped Maggie, the protagonist of his novel, based on his hometown life and his growing-up experience. Anecdotes about Maggie's childhood, the agony of her adolescence, the love of her brother and sister, and her ununderstood love are all pieces of Eliot's memory. Like the author herself, Maggie was exiled by her family and society for her rebellious behaviour; because of her narrow morality, she was always in the abyss of pain, so she was often called a martyr. However, the potential subversive forces hidden at the end of the work are often ignored. This paper attempts to re-interpret the Mill on the Flos River from the perspective of neo-historicism. Eliot recorded a great deal of marginal discourse in the Mill on the Flos River. Through the marginal discourse recorded by Eliot and his anti-traditional experiences, this paper explains Maggie's challenge to mainstream consciousness and social authority. Based on Greenblatt's subversion suppression theory and Foucault's power theory, this paper analyzes how Maggie was suppressed. It was in the vicissitudes of subversion and suppression that power emerged. As Foucault says, power subverts and serves repression. This thesis is divided into five parts: the first chapter, preface, introduces Eliot's early novels and the research status of Mill on the Flos, and briefly introduces Greenblatt's suppressionism of subversion and Foucault's power theory, and gives a brief introduction to Greenblatt's theory of suppression of subversion and Foucault's theory of power. The second chapter explores the "small history" written in the works and the recorded marginal discourse, and introduces Eliot's humanism and the concordance of the new historicism. The third chapter introduces Maggie's power to subvert the mainstream and authority of society at different ages, especially her subversion of the image of "Family Angel" in the Mills on the Flos River. Chapter four analyzes how Maggie's subversive forces were suppressed in her childhood, adolescence and adulthood. The conclusion points out that the Mill on the Flos River records a small history with the voices of Maggie's marginal people. Despite her hard struggle to pursue her ideals, her subversive forces were suppressed and power was realized. The author believes that the interpretation of the Mill on the Flos River by New historicism also has its shortcomings, because the New historicists tend to emphasize the ultimate role of inhibition. But when the flood came, Maggie rowed to save the authority of Tom, a weak woman abandoned by her family and society, and her death did not mean she was completely repressed. New historicists, however, tend to overlook Maggie's potential subversive power.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I561.074
本文编号：2438776
[Abstract]:The Mill on the Frost River is recognized as one of George Eliot's early best works and a semi-autobiographical novel. As soon as the novel was published, it was relished by many critics. Eliot shaped Maggie, the protagonist of his novel, based on his hometown life and his growing-up experience. Anecdotes about Maggie's childhood, the agony of her adolescence, the love of her brother and sister, and her ununderstood love are all pieces of Eliot's memory. Like the author herself, Maggie was exiled by her family and society for her rebellious behaviour; because of her narrow morality, she was always in the abyss of pain, so she was often called a martyr. However, the potential subversive forces hidden at the end of the work are often ignored. This paper attempts to re-interpret the Mill on the Flos River from the perspective of neo-historicism. Eliot recorded a great deal of marginal discourse in the Mill on the Flos River. Through the marginal discourse recorded by Eliot and his anti-traditional experiences, this paper explains Maggie's challenge to mainstream consciousness and social authority. Based on Greenblatt's subversion suppression theory and Foucault's power theory, this paper analyzes how Maggie was suppressed. It was in the vicissitudes of subversion and suppression that power emerged. As Foucault says, power subverts and serves repression. This thesis is divided into five parts: the first chapter, preface, introduces Eliot's early novels and the research status of Mill on the Flos, and briefly introduces Greenblatt's suppressionism of subversion and Foucault's power theory, and gives a brief introduction to Greenblatt's theory of suppression of subversion and Foucault's theory of power. The second chapter explores the "small history" written in the works and the recorded marginal discourse, and introduces Eliot's humanism and the concordance of the new historicism. The third chapter introduces Maggie's power to subvert the mainstream and authority of society at different ages, especially her subversion of the image of "Family Angel" in the Mills on the Flos River. Chapter four analyzes how Maggie's subversive forces were suppressed in her childhood, adolescence and adulthood. The conclusion points out that the Mill on the Flos River records a small history with the voices of Maggie's marginal people. Despite her hard struggle to pursue her ideals, her subversive forces were suppressed and power was realized. The author believes that the interpretation of the Mill on the Flos River by New historicism also has its shortcomings, because the New historicists tend to emphasize the ultimate role of inhibition. But when the flood came, Maggie rowed to save the authority of Tom, a weak woman abandoned by her family and society, and her death did not mean she was completely repressed. New historicists, however, tend to overlook Maggie's potential subversive power.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：I561.074
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 褚晓航;;《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》的生态女性主义解读[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年11期
2 李华;;从《弗洛斯河上的磨坊》看爱略特的人文主义思想[J];黄山学院学报;2006年01期
3 钱程;;权力的抑制与抗争——试析沃尔曼《欧洲中心》中的《清白之手》[J];山东外语教学;2008年02期
4 马广利;;颠覆与抑制:《李尔王》中的权力话语[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 傅洁琳;格林布拉特新历史主义与文化诗学研究[D];山东大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张秀娟;略论新历史主义批评的文论观[D];新疆大学;2003年
2 胡鹏;新历史主义视角下的《亨利八世》[D];四川外语学院;2009年
本文编号：2438776
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/2438776.html
