当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 文学创作论文 >

《玫瑰之名》与诗术——埃柯与亚里士多德的谐剧观

发布时间:2019-04-17 14:33
【摘要】:亚里士多德的《诗术》仅存论肃剧部分,论谐剧部分佚失或根本就没写。当代著名意大利学者埃柯以小说虚构的方式假定,《诗术》的谐剧部分被中世纪晚期的基督教修士扼杀在修院图书馆密室。《诗术》第4~5两章中有涉及谐剧的段落,亚里士多德对谐剧的基本看法是:与肃剧模仿高尚的行为相比,谐剧仅模仿低俗的行为。从而,诗术有高尚与低俗的品质高低之分。通过对比可以看到,埃柯以小说虚构的方式解构了亚里士多德的诗术的如此高低之分。
[Abstract]:Aristotle's Poetry only exists in the melodrama part, and the anecdotal part is lost or not written at all. Eko, a famous contemporary Italian scholar, assumes, in fiction, that the melodrama part of the poem was strangled by Christian monks in the late Middle Ages in the secluded chamber of the academy library. Chapters 4-5 of the Book of Poetry contain passages relating to the play. Aristotle's basic view of melodrama is that, compared with the mimicry of the virtuous drama, the play only imitates the vulgar behavior. Thus, poetry has noble and vulgar quality. By contrast, Eko deconstructs Aristotle's poetry in fictional ways.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学文学院;
【基金】:中国人民大学文学院“211工程”第三期项目“经典与解释”阶段性成果
【分类号】:I106.3


本文编号:2459530

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wxchuangz/2459530.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户efb38***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com