戏剧《苹果车》的语用研究

发布时间：2021-12-25 05:41

　　运用语用学的相关理论来研究文学作品,从而产生了一门新的生命力较强的交叉学科——文学语用学或语用文体学。戏剧是文学作品中的一个重要组成部分和特殊表现形式,主要依靠戏剧语言推动情节发展和展现人物性格。语用学理论对文学作品有很强的解释性,尤其适用于解读戏剧中的对白和小说中的对话。《苹果车》是萧伯纳晚年时期的作品,是其政治幻想剧的代表作,但他晚年的作品没有得到应有的重视。本文将运用语用学的两大主要理论,即格莱斯的合作原则理论以及利奇和布朗、莱文森的礼貌原则理论来解读萧伯纳的戏剧《苹果车》里丰富的会话含义。本文对这两个理论进行了详细阐述,并解释了它们之间的关系,为分析会话含义和间接表达方式提供了清晰的理论框架和研究工具。美国哲学家格莱斯认为,在所有的言语交际活动中为了达到特定的目标,说话人和听话人之间存在着一种默契,一种双方都应该遵守的原则,它称之为合作原则并具体提出了四个准则。事实上,这些准则常被违反从而产生会话含义。格莱斯和会话含义自60年代末提出以来,激起了研究者的极大兴趣。但他的这个理论也有不足之处,用来解释语言现象还存在一些问题。其中之一即合作原则只解释了人们间接使用语言所产生的会话含... 

【文章来源】：山东师范大学山东省

【文章页数】：76 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
    Pragmastylistics
    Drama
    George Bernard Shaw and His The Apple Cart
    Research Methodology
    Thesis Organization
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Pragmastylistic Analysis of Literature at Home and Abroad
        1.1.1 Pragmastylistic Analysis of Literature Abroad
        1.1.2 Pragmastylistic Analysis of Literature at Home
    1.2 Critical Review on G.B. Shaw and His Drama The Apple Cart at Home and Abroad
Chapter Two Theoretical Framework
    2.1 Cooperative Principle
        2.1.1 Grice’s Cooperative Principle
        2.1.2 Flouting the Maxims
            2.1.2.1 Flouting the Maxim of Quality
            2.1.2.2 Flouting the Maxim of Quantity
            2.1.2.3 Flouting the Maxim of Relevance
            2.1.2.4 Flouting the Maxim of Manner
            2.1.2.5 Two Kinds of Conversational Implicatures
    2.2 Politeness Principle
        2.2.1 Leech’s Politeness Principle
        2.2.2 Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Principle
            2.2.2.1 Face Theory
            2.2.2.2 Face-threatening Acts
            2.2.2.3 Off-record Strategies
    2.3 The Relationship and the Conflicts Between Cooperative Principle and Politeness Principle
Chapter Three Case Analysis: Conversational Implicatures of The Apple Cart
    3.1 Conversational Implicatures Generated by Violating the Maxim of Quality
        3.1.1 Irony
        3.1.2 Metaphor
        3.1.3 Rhetorical Question
    3.2 Conversational Implicatures Generated by Violating the Maxim of Quantity
        3.2.1 Understatement or Overstatement
        3.2.2 Tautology
    3.3 Conversational Implicatures Generated by Violating the Maxim of Relevance
        3.3.1 Giving Hint
        3.3.2 Giving Association Clue
    3.4 Conversational Implicatures Generated by Violating the Maxim of Manner
        3.4.1 Being Ambiguous or Vague
        3.4.2 Being Incomplete or Using Ellipsis
        3.4.3 Displacing Hearer or Over-Generalization
    3.5 General Findings
Chapter Four Conclusion
Bibliography
Acknowledges
攻读学位期间发表的学术论文



本文编号：3551889