西方思维与文学教育的理论基点批判

发布时间：2018-01-18 01:28

本文关键词：西方思维与文学教育的理论基点批判　出处：《学术研究》2011年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国传统文学教育的理论基点,着眼于文学"怎么样",西方作为知识生产的文学理论则更注重文学"是什么",它先天地伴随着本体论同语言论的纠葛。由存在论而来的本体论,随着"存在"(to be)被翻译为"是",演变为追问某物是"什么"的本质论。语言的本体意义在于宇宙整体能为大道之言或无言之言,文学语言的本体意义在于能够超越在场,从说出的东西中暗示未说出的东西。作为知识生产的文学理论的本质主义思维方式,有三大根源和三大缺陷,目前我们所接受的反本质主义,远没有转向主客相融的思维方式重要。文学独立性和归属性问题的大轮回,只是文学教育理论基点回归的前提,关键还在于反思主客二分思维方式的弊病,把文学当作文学而不是生产知识的原材料。
[Abstract]:The theoretical basis of Chinese traditional literature education focuses on the literature "how", while the western literature theory as knowledge production pays more attention to the literature "what is". The ontology, which comes from ontology, is translated as "yes" with "being". The Noumenon meaning of language lies in the fact that the whole universe can be the main way or the speechless word, and the Noumenon meaning of the literary language lies in being able to transcend the presence. As the mode of thinking of essentialism in literary theory of knowledge production, there are three major sources and three defects, which we accept as anti-essentialism at present. The problem of literary independence and attribution is only the premise of the return of literary education theory, and the key lies in the reflection of the shortcomings of the two-part thinking mode of subject and object. Treat literature as literature, not as the raw material for producing knowledge.
【作者单位】：中山大学中文系;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社科基金规划项目“洛特曼研究与中国当代文论新视角”(05BZW011) 广东省学位委员会项目“后现代思潮挑战与研究生文艺理论课程改革的探讨”(10JGXM-ZC01) 广州社科规划项目“后现代思潮挑战与新世纪文艺学发展”(09Y41)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I0-05
【正文快照】： 一、文学教育与两种文学理论我国当代文学理论,一直以它全方位同步捕捉社会思潮变化的敏感迅捷,以及尽力跟上西方形而上学沉思进展的思辨能力,涉及到人文社会科学的各个领域。所处的位置非常醒目而又十分优雅,给世人的印象则既紧贴现实又深奥高远。然而,一旦“面向事实本身”

【参考文献】