“文学性”及“文学性”新建构——文学的人类学省思

发布时间：2018-01-20 08:23

本文关键词： 文学性纯文学文学性新建构大文学　出处：《晋阳学刊》2010年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：上世纪80年代以来我国文学界所倡言之"文学性"作为一种文化舶来品,在新时期以及新世纪的中国文坛,并未得到充分审视和反思,大多数文学学者和作家想当然地将"文学性"普遍化、普世化,由"文学性"而至"纯文学",以这种带有西方话语霸权和历史局限性的文学标准来准则当下的中国文学作品,结果造成当代文学批评的"妄语"或"失语"。因此,必须对已然十分僵化和保守的"文学性"和"纯文学"理念进行必要的修正,将"文学性"内涵实质从语言表现层面探源至文学作品的情感存在和情感生成层面,也即"文学作品之所以成为文学作品"的本体性存在层面。从人类学立场出发,我们将"文学性"界定为文学作品的3种质性,即1.文本的语言文字规定性;2.文本的人类情感性;3.文本的文学修辞性。
[Abstract]:Since -20s, the "literariness" advocated by Chinese literary circles, as a cultural import, has not been fully examined and reconsidered in the new period and in the new century. Most literary scholars and writers take it for granted that "literariness" is universal and universal, from "literariness" to "pure literature". This kind of literary standard with western discourse hegemony and historical limitation to guide the current Chinese literary works results in "false words" or "aphasia" of contemporary literary criticism. The concepts of "literariness" and "pure literature", which are already very rigid and conservative, must be amended. This paper explores the essence of "literariness" from the aspect of language expression to the level of emotional existence and emotional generation of literary works. From the standpoint of anthropology, we define "literariness" as the three germplasm of literary works, I. e., the language and characters of the text; 2.The human emotion of the text; 3. Literary rhetoric of the text.
【作者单位】：深圳大学文学院;
【分类号】：I021
【正文快照】： 一“、文学性”及其现代局限英文中的文学性literariness和literaturality分别从literary和literature两个词派生而来。literary意即文学的,加上后缀ness,表示文学之“质性”——文学性,说某一文本是literary work,那也就是说这个文本具有文学的特质。我们通常说一个作品具有

【参考文献】