文学生态学研究

发布时间：2018-02-15 15:43

本文关键词： 文学生态学隐喻精神圈文学与政治文学与意识形态文学与经济　出处：《南京师范大学》2004年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：生态学是研究有机体与其环境相互作用的科学。它是随着人们对环境危机日益关注迅速发展起来的。作为思想史的范式，，生态学已经越过学科边界，扩展到政治、法律、经济、哲学、伦理、美学等领域，形成了“泛生态学化”的态势。本论文中所称的“文学生态学”，是文学的生态学隐喻(metaphor)，即用生态学的方法来观察、研究和解释文学以及文学与“文学的环境”(精神圈)之间的关系。生态学是关于复杂性的科学。文学的生态学的隐喻，意味着我们应当重新认识文学和文学理论的复杂性：1．文学的关系性。文学是处于它的环境之中的，文学是人类精神家族(如政治、意识形态、经济、文化、社会等)中的一个分支。它与“环境”之间不断地进行符号性的交换。文学没有先验的本质，它的本质只能存在于它与“环境”的关系之中。2．文学的有机性。我们应当把文学看作是类生命的对象。文学是一个生长、发育和进化的过程。文学通过母题、叙事学结构、经典(显性的)和成规(隐性的)来实现自己的“遗传性”。3．文学的整体性。无论是文学作品本身(形式和内容)还是文学活动的各个方面(创作、阅读、批评)，都应当作为一个整体进行研究，而不是将他们肢解为互不关联的散沙。本论文强调，文学生态学是文学的生态学隐喻，但是，隐喻并不是模糊，因为我们的普通概念系统基本上是隐喻的。在生态学的隐喻之下，进一步论述了文学的关系性、有机性和整体性。本论文论述了文学与政治的回环关系。文学与政治都是人类的符号行为，因此二者构成了超循环同构关系。政治的合法性前提是由文学的虚构和叙事建构的。文学以对政治无意识的显现和戏仿对政治发生“争辩”的关系。文学通过“政治文化”来编写公民的政治“脚本”。政治则通过对文学的经典化过程的干预，实现其对文学的宰制。本论文讨论了文学与意识形态的错综关系。通过文本的征候阅读，借鉴人类学关于仪式和典礼的理论，本文试图说明意识形态是如何经由文本与实践进行再生产的，同时还探讨了文本中各种意识形态的纠合与冲突关系。本论文讨论了文学与经济的协同与颉颃关系。文学一般地是由经济主导的，但是，文学也可以维护或者批判社会生产方式的意识形态。文学与经济的关系还有3种形式：不平衡、断裂与互渗。文学应当表达人们在经济领域中“内在的道德关照”，促进稳态经济的生成，实现经济、社会与文化的协调发展. 文学生态学关注精神圈各学科的协同、互渗，最终能够促进生活世界各领域的协调和谐。
[Abstract]:Ecology is a science that studies the interaction between organisms and their environment. It develops rapidly as people pay more and more attention to the environmental crisis. As a paradigm in the history of thought, ecology has crossed the discipline boundary and expanded to politics, law, economy, Philosophy, ethics, aesthetics and other fields, formed a "pan-ecological" situation. The term "literary ecology" in this thesis is the ecological metaphor of literature, that is, to observe, study and explain literature and the relationship between literature and "the environment of literature" (spiritual circle) by ecological method. Ecology is the science of complexity. The ecological metaphor of literature means that we should re-understand the complexity of literature and literary theory: 1.The relationship of literature. Literature is in its environment. Literature is a branch of the human spiritual family (such as politics, ideology, economy, culture, society, etc.). There is a constant exchange of symbols between literature and "environment". Literature has no priori nature. Its essence can only exist in its relationship with "environment" .2. the organic nature of literature. We should regard literature as the object of quasi-life. Literature is a process of growth, development and evolution. Classical (explicit) and stereotypical (implicit) to achieve their own "heredity" .3.Literary integrity. Whether it is the literary work itself (form and content) or all aspects of literary activities (creation, reading, reading, reading), Criticism should be studied as a whole, not disjointed as disconnected sand. This thesis emphasizes that literary ecology is the ecological metaphor of literature, but metaphor is not vague, because our general conceptual system is basically metaphorical. Organic and holistic. This paper discusses the relationship between literature and politics. Both literature and politics are symbolic behaviors of human beings. Therefore, the two constitute hypercyclic isomorphism. The premise of political legitimacy is constructed by literary fiction and narration. Literature "argues" with the appearance of political unconscious and parody of politics. Political culture is used to write political "scripts" for citizens. Politics interferes with the process of literary canonization. To realize its domination of literature. This paper discusses the complex relationship between literature and ideology. By reading the texts and drawing lessons from anthropological theories on rituals and ceremonies, this paper attempts to explain how ideology is reproduced through text and practice. At the same time, it also discusses the relationship between various ideologies and conflicts in the text. This paper discusses the synergy and antagonism between literature and economy. Generally speaking, literature is dominated by economy, but, Literature can also maintain or criticize the ideology of social production. There are three forms of the relationship between literature and economy: imbalance, Fracture and infiltration. Literature should express people's "inner moral concern" in the economic field, and promote the growth of steady economy. To realize the harmonious development of economy, society and culture. Literary ecology pays close attention to the synergy and mutual permeation of various disciplines in the spiritual circle, which can eventually promote the coordination and coordination of the various fields of life. Harmonic.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：I0-05

【引证文献】