关于“形式本体”问题的通信

发布时间：2018-03-29 15:25

本文选题：形式模型　切入点：抽象主义　出处：《学术研究》2011年06期

【摘要】：形式问题是西方美学和艺术理论中的一个关键问题,也是我国美学和文艺学研究的一个重要领域。为了推进这一问题的研究,本刊去年第10期编发了苏宏斌教授的《形式何以成为本体》一文。该文认为,西方艺术和美学中存在着两种基本的形式观念:一种是质料—形式模型,认为艺术作品是形式与质料的统一体,形式乃是作品的本体;另一种是内容—形式模型,认为形式只是现象,是由作品的内容所决定的。西方现代艺术抛弃了内容—形式模型,采用纯粹的质料—形式模型,因此走向了形式主义和抽象主义。文章发表之后,引起了学术界的广泛关注。近日,我国著名文艺理论家王元骧先生与苏宏斌教授就该文所涉及到的问题,以书信的形式展开了争论。我们认为,发表这些通信,对于推进有关形式问题的研究、加深对现代艺术的理解,都是不无裨益的。同时,针对当前学术界普遍存在的那种抱团混战、党同伐异的不良现象,我们十分倡导这种以探求真理为目标的、同志式和商讨式的健康学风,也欢迎更多的学界同仁就此发表意见,畅所欲言。
[Abstract]:The problem of form is a key problem in western aesthetics and art theory, and is also an important field in the study of aesthetics and literature and art in China. In the 10th issue of our journal last year, Professor Su Hongbin's Why form became Noumenon was published. The article holds that there are two basic formal concepts in western art and aesthetics: one is the material form model. The author thinks that art works are the unity of form and material, form is the Noumenon of works, the other is content-form model, which thinks that form is only a phenomenon, which is determined by the content of the work. Western modern art has abandoned the content-form model. Adopting a pure material-form model, which leads to formalism and abstractness. After the publication of the article, it has attracted extensive attention from the academic community. Recently, Mr. Wang Yuanxiang, a famous literary and artistic theorist in China, and Professor Su Hongbin have argued in the form of letters on the issues involved in this article. We believe that the publication of these communications will advance the study of relevant formal issues. It is beneficial to deepen our understanding of modern art. At the same time, in the light of the prevailing phenomenon of clinging to different parties and different parties in academic circles, we very much advocate this kind of "seeking truth" as the goal. Gay and deliberative style of health study, but also welcome more academic colleagues to express their views and speak freely.
【作者单位】：浙江大学中文系;
【分类号】：J0

【相似文献】