视觉艺术中的挪用

发布时间：2018-03-30 07:45

本文选题：艺术　切入点：挪用　出处：《清华大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】： 挪用现象在艺术领域十分普遍,可以说没有挪用就没有艺术,而关于挪用的理论在我国却未曾得见,在国外也只是只言片语,系统的论述也未被发现。本文意图通过对挪用的概念、内涵、类别的总结以及中西方哲学的思考,并通过实证研究和历史分析,探讨挪用的成因和机理,试图找出挪用在艺术中的规律,进行一次破冰之旅。挪用可以在多种、多重意义上使用。通过挪用对象、挪用与摹仿、挪用与复制、剽窃的辨析,文章试图揭示其丰富的内涵。通过师古人、师造化和师夷三种不同的维度的理论分析,文章还试图揭示挪用在各民族文化交流和文化传承方面的意义。通过对挪用与艺术创造关系的研究,作者试图进一步阐述挪用深刻的寓意以及多重关联。对挪用的技巧分析,我们不难发现在艺术中挪用对各个领域的影响和意义,并发现其一些规则化、技艺化的发展趋势。也许挪用是艺术本身抑或只是一种艺术创作手段的追问永远都没有答案,也许挪用与摹仿、挪用与剽窃的关系并非作者一时能够理清,但对挪用在艺术领域的理性思考却意义深远。文章通过对绘画、摄影、书法和电影等领域的实证分析,研究了挪用在艺术各门类的横向存在和交叉影响,以及从纵向历史发展的角度,探讨了挪用在中西方艺术流变中的表现和作用。作为一名艺术理论的学习者和艺术实践者,作者不仅注重实证研究和历史分析,还试图通过比较研究来揭示挪用的整个艺术生活场景。不仅对挪用在古典艺术和现代艺术的生存状况进行了描述,还聚焦于挪用在后现代艺术等当代艺术中正反两个方面的表演,并将目光投向挪用在未来艺术领域的发展趋向。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon of misappropriation is very common in the field of art. It can be said that there is no art without misappropriation, but the theory of misappropriation has not been found in our country.This paper intends to explore the causes and mechanism of misappropriation through the summary of the concept, connotation, category and philosophy of China and the West, and through empirical research and historical analysis, in order to find out the law of misappropriation in art.On an ice-breaking trip.Misappropriation can be used in many, many ways.This paper tries to reveal the rich connotation of the object of misappropriation, misappropriating and imitating, misappropriating and copying, plagiarism.Through the theoretical analysis of the three different dimensions of the ancients, the division and the division, the article also tries to reveal the significance of misappropriation in the cultural exchange and cultural inheritance of the various nationalities.Through the study of the relationship between misappropriation and artistic creation, the author tries to further expound the profound implication and multi-connection of misappropriation.It is not difficult to find out the influence and significance of misappropriation on various fields in art, and find the trend of regularization and artistry in the analysis of the skill of misappropriation.Perhaps there is no answer to the question whether misappropriation is art itself or is just a means of artistic creation. Perhaps the relationship between embezzlement and plagiarism cannot be clarified by the author for a time.However, the rational thinking of misappropriation in the field of art is of profound significance.Through the empirical analysis of painting, photography, calligraphy and film, this paper studies the horizontal existence and cross influence of misappropriation in various categories of art, as well as the perspective of vertical historical development.This paper probes into the expression and function of misappropriation in the evolution of Chinese and western art.As a learner and practitioner of art theory, the author not only pays attention to empirical research and historical analysis, but also attempts to reveal the whole art life scene of misappropriation through comparative study.This paper not only describes the living conditions of misappropriation in classical art and modern art, but also focuses on the performance of misappropriation in both positive and negative aspects of contemporary art, such as post-modern art, and focuses on the development trend of misappropriation in the field of future art.
【学位授予单位】：清华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：J04

【参考文献】