文学现代性的冲动与反思

发布时间：2018-04-23 01:26

本文选题：文学性 + 现代性　；参考：《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年01期

【摘要】：文学性是令人关注的问题又是充满困惑的问题。从现代性入手才能理清文学性的逻辑脉络,才能揭示其历史建构中的价值诉求。关于文学性的普遍主义和历史主义之争,并非对文学性的肯定与否定之争,其间所强调的是文学性的存在形态,即文学性与现代化历史的联系,并进而探讨文学现代性理论建构。如果说西方文学理论的变化主要体现为理性反思形态的话,那么,新时期文学理论的变化则是呈现为现代性的冲动,这种冲动因理论准备不足和理性底气不足而留下遗憾。重新审视"向内转"和"纯文学"的讨论,为文学现代性反思选择了有价值的对象,也提供了理论建构的空间。对文学现代性冲动进行反思,需要现代性理念的导引,同时倚重诗意维度,展开以文学阅读为始的科学严谨的研究和理论的探索。
[Abstract]:Literariness is a matter of concern and confusion. It is only from modernity that we can clear up the logical thread of literariness and reveal the value demand in its historical construction. The controversy between universalism and historicism of literariness is not a dispute between affirmation and negation of literariness. What is emphasized is the existential form of literariness, that is, the connection between literariness and modern history. And then discusses the construction of literary modernity theory. If the change of western literary theory is mainly reflected in rational reflection, then the change of literary theory in the new period is the impulse of modernity, which is regretted by the lack of theoretical preparation and rational foundation. To re-examine the discussion of "turning inward" and "pure literature" not only selects valuable objects for literary modernity reflection, but also provides space for theoretical construction. To reflect on the impulse of literary modernity, we need the guidance of the concept of modernity, and at the same time, we should rely on the poetic dimension to carry out scientific and rigorous research and theoretical exploration beginning with literary reading.
【作者单位】：山东师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：I02

【参考文献】