论功能主义，真实与叛逆在文学翻译中的表现

发布时间：2018-05-01 01:23

本文选题：功能主义 + 目的论　；参考：《上海外国语大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】： 许多翻译理论家都试图为长期以来一直争论不休的有关翻译原则和翻译策略的问题找到解决办法,但翻译界始终不能在这些问题上达成一致意见。而直译、意译之争,以及近年来对于归化、异化的辩论正是这些矛盾的反映。本文回顾了直译、意译,归化、异化的一些重要理论及观点,并对功能主义理论的某些观点,特别是费美尔的“目的论”(Vermeer, Skopos theory)进行了介绍。通过对一些文学翻译实例的比较,探讨了在文学翻译过程中翻译发起人(主要为出版商)、原语作者、译者和读者之间的关系以及他们各自对译作所产生的影响,进而详述了目的论的原则在翻译文学作品中所起到的作用。本文的目的并不是要指出哪一种翻译策略是最好的,而是想说明在文学翻译过程中,只有对翻译的目的有清晰的认识,并对之进行仔细的分析,翻译作品才能真正获得成功。
[Abstract]:Many translation theorists have tried to find solutions to the problems of translation principles and translation strategies which have been debated for a long time, but the translation community can not reach an agreement on these issues. The conflicts of literal translation, free translation, and the debate on domestication and alienation in recent years are the reflection of these contradictions. This paper reviews some important theories and viewpoints of literal translation, free translation, domestication and alienation, and introduces some viewpoints of functionalism theory, especially Fermeer's Skopos theory (Vermeer, Skopos theory). By comparing some examples of literary translation, this paper discusses the relationship between the initiators (mainly publishers, original authors, translators and readers) in the process of literary translation and their respective influences on the translation. Furthermore, the role of Skopos principle in translation of literary works is discussed in detail. The purpose of this thesis is not to point out which translation strategy is the best, but to show that in the process of literary translation, only when we have a clear understanding of the purpose of translation and make a careful analysis of it, can the translated works be truly successful.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I046

【相似文献】