文学理论的功能极限——兼及30年文学理论研究与未来突破

发布时间：2018-05-21 06:58

本文选题：文学理论 + 功能限度　；参考：《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年01期

【摘要】：文学理论的主体性是文学理论身份存在的根本问题,此为以往学界所忽略。30年文学理论的发展,由于缺少自觉的理论主体意识,而使文学理论的效力发挥受到限制和影响。文学理论的主体性及其功能效力,以建立文学理论与文学事实的合理互动关系为基础,而以往的文学理论在楔入文学事实时,或因聚集于文学特质的本体追问而陷于某种普泛失根的困窘,或因局限于某些文学母题的单向涉入,而使理论与现实的对话造成错位、脱节乃至整体感的迷失。总结30年文学理论的发展经验,应在明确文学理论功能指向性的前提下,拓宽拓深文学理论与文学事实的对应领域,通过强化文学理论的主体性,最大限度地突破文学理论的功能极限,使中国文学理论绽现出新的历史景观。
[Abstract]:The subjectivity of literary theory is the fundamental problem of the existence of literary theoretical identity, which has been ignored by the academic circles in the past. The development of literary theory in the past 30 years has restricted and influenced the effectiveness of literary theory because of the lack of conscious theoretical subject consciousness. The subjectivity of literary theory and its functional effect are based on the establishment of a rational interaction between literary theory and literary facts. Either because the Noumenon that gathers in the literary characteristic is trapped in the embarrassment of some universal loss of roots, or because it is confined to some literary motif, it causes the dialogue between theory and reality to be misplaced, disjointed and even lost in the sense of the whole. To sum up the development experience of 30 years' literary theory, we should broaden the corresponding field of the extension of literary theory and literary facts on the premise of clarifying the function of literary theory, and strengthen the subjectivity of literary theory. Breaking through the functional limit of literary theory to the maximum extent, Chinese literary theory has revealed a new historical landscape.
【作者单位】：江南大学文学院;
【分类号】：I0-02

【参考文献】