政治认同的审美性——兼重审文学在“再政治化”中的本体论建构

发布时间：2018-07-17 01:46

【摘要】：审美性不是建构政治认同的外部工具或偶然装饰,而是其内部本质和必然诉求;不是"对象性"的单向美感显现,而是"对象——主体间性"的双向审美共契;不是认同对象浅层次的身体美学、感官快适或视觉表征,而是深层次的超功利、静观的诗性超越。真正深入和持久的政治认同必须与主体政治文化境遇中的潜境遇、隐境遇和元境遇交融,蕴涵着审美距离、诗性体验和仪式情感等方面的审美论要求。脱离审美性的政治认同建构是不稳定的意识形态灌装或对浅认同、伪认同的生产。政治认同的审美性对文学在建构政治认同中的意义奠定着本体论而非仅是方法论层面的理论根基。在文学的"再政治化"以及文学与政治的关系中,问题不仅仅是文学是否和如何具有政治性,而是政治是否和如何具有文学性。
[Abstract]:Aesthetics is not an external tool or accidental decoration to construct political identity, but its internal essence and inevitable demand; it is not the appearance of one-way aesthetic sense of "objectiveness", but the two-way aesthetic common understanding of "object-subject nature". It is not the superficial body aesthetics, sensual adaptation or visual representation of the object, but the poetic transcendence of the deep-level super-utilitarian and static view. A truly deep and lasting political identity must blend with the latent circumstances of the subject's political and cultural circumstances, the implicit circumstances and the meta-circumstances, and contain the aesthetic requirements in the aspects of aesthetic distance, poetic experience and ritual emotion. The construction of political identity separated from aesthetic is the production of unstable ideology filling or the production of shallow identity and false identity. The aesthetic nature of political identity lays the theoretical foundation of ontology, not just methodology, for the significance of literature in constructing political identity. In the "re-politicization" of literature and the relationship between literature and politics, the question is not only whether and how literature is political, but whether and how politics is literary.
【作者单位】：北京市社会科学院文学研究所;
【分类号】：I0

【参考文献】