论“文学是人学”的理论内涵及其意义
发布时间：2018-09-02 06:45
【摘要】：“文学是人学”这一论断已被当今的文学理论界广泛引用。在中国明确提出这一论断的是钱谷融先生。他的著名论文《论“文学是人学”》不仅提出了“文学是人学”的观点，而且代表了当时理论认识的最高水平，是钱谷融先生“人学”理论的集中体现。钱谷融先生虽然因此遭受了二十余年的磨难，但他始终坚持自己的“人学”主张，不断从理论和实践上证明自己的观点。 本文在研读分析的基础上论述了《论“文学是人学”》在文学的目的和任务、文学与现实的关系、文学的典型性、人道主义原则等方面的观点，揭示其以“人”为中心解释文学中诸问题的正确性和合理性。进一步从历史和美学的角度论述了《论“文学是人学”》的两个突出意义：一是它在特殊的社会背景和理论背景下的历史价值。它继承了“五四”时期“人的文学”传统，，但超越了个人人道主义；它既关注个性又关注人的社会性，避免了以往理论家或强调阶级性或强调普遍的人性的偏颇；它不仅对当时流行的一些错误理论和认识作了一针见血的批评，而且对新时期以后的文学思想产生了极大的影响。二是展示了人道主义美学的永久魅力。本文从贯穿文学过程始终的情感特性、个性特征两方面阐述了钱谷融的人道主义美学观点，并指出作家、评论家缺少来自生活的强烈的情感体验，在经济大潮中难以保持独立自由的个性，是当今文学不被人们关注的重要原因。 如今重新解读钱谷融先生的《论“文学是人学”》，在文学领域中坚持以“人”为本，遵循人道主义美学原则，提倡和发扬人的文学精神，对推动文学抚慰人的心灵、给人以希望、教人以挚爱的价值取向，具有积极的作用。
[Abstract]:The theory that literature is human has been widely used in the field of literary theory. It is Mr Qian Gurong who has made this claim clear in China. His famous paper "Literature is Human" not only puts forward the viewpoint that "Literature is Human", but also represents the highest level of theoretical understanding at that time, and is the concentrated embodiment of Qian Gurong's "Humanistic" theory. Although Qian Gurong has suffered for more than twenty years, he has always insisted on his theory of "human studies" and proved his views in theory and practice. On the basis of reading and analyzing, this paper discusses the viewpoints of "Literature is the study of Man" in the aspects of the purpose and task of literature, the relationship between literature and reality, the typicality of literature, the principle of humanitarianism, etc. It reveals the correctness and reasonableness of its interpretation of various problems in literature centered on "man". From the perspective of history and aesthetics, this paper further discusses the two prominent meanings of "Literature is the study of Man": the first is its historical value under the special social and theoretical background. It inherits the tradition of "human literature" during the "May 4th Movement" period, but transcends individual humanitarianism, pays attention to both individuality and sociality, and avoids the bias of previous theorists or class nature or universal humanity. It not only criticizes some of the wrong theories and understandings that were popular at that time, but also has a great influence on the literary thought after the new period. Second, it shows the permanent charm of humanitarian aesthetics. This paper expounds Qian Gurong's viewpoint of humanitarian aesthetics from two aspects: emotional characteristics and personality characteristics throughout the literary process, and points out that writers and critics lack a strong emotional experience from life. In the economic tide, it is difficult to maintain the personality of independence and freedom, which is an important reason why literature is not paid attention to. Now we should reinterpret Mr. Qian Gurong's "Literature is the study of Man", adhere to the principle of "people" as the basis in the field of literature, follow the principles of humanitarian aesthetics, advocate and carry forward the spirit of human literature, and promote literature to soothe people's hearts. Give people hope, teach people to love the value orientation, has the positive effect.
【学位授予单位】：首都师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2218581
[Abstract]:The theory that literature is human has been widely used in the field of literary theory. It is Mr Qian Gurong who has made this claim clear in China. His famous paper "Literature is Human" not only puts forward the viewpoint that "Literature is Human", but also represents the highest level of theoretical understanding at that time, and is the concentrated embodiment of Qian Gurong's "Humanistic" theory. Although Qian Gurong has suffered for more than twenty years, he has always insisted on his theory of "human studies" and proved his views in theory and practice. On the basis of reading and analyzing, this paper discusses the viewpoints of "Literature is the study of Man" in the aspects of the purpose and task of literature, the relationship between literature and reality, the typicality of literature, the principle of humanitarianism, etc. It reveals the correctness and reasonableness of its interpretation of various problems in literature centered on "man". From the perspective of history and aesthetics, this paper further discusses the two prominent meanings of "Literature is the study of Man": the first is its historical value under the special social and theoretical background. It inherits the tradition of "human literature" during the "May 4th Movement" period, but transcends individual humanitarianism, pays attention to both individuality and sociality, and avoids the bias of previous theorists or class nature or universal humanity. It not only criticizes some of the wrong theories and understandings that were popular at that time, but also has a great influence on the literary thought after the new period. Second, it shows the permanent charm of humanitarian aesthetics. This paper expounds Qian Gurong's viewpoint of humanitarian aesthetics from two aspects: emotional characteristics and personality characteristics throughout the literary process, and points out that writers and critics lack a strong emotional experience from life. In the economic tide, it is difficult to maintain the personality of independence and freedom, which is an important reason why literature is not paid attention to. Now we should reinterpret Mr. Qian Gurong's "Literature is the study of Man", adhere to the principle of "people" as the basis in the field of literature, follow the principles of humanitarian aesthetics, advocate and carry forward the spirit of human literature, and promote literature to soothe people's hearts. Give people hope, teach people to love the value orientation, has the positive effect.
【学位授予单位】：首都师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 杨剑龙;众声喧哗中的独特见解——被批判的钱谷融、蒋孔阳的理论建树[J];广东教育学院学报;2003年04期
2 季进,曾一果;钱谷融先生的文学思想述论[J];文学评论;2005年02期
本文编号：2218581
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2218581.html
