女性写作话语策略

发布时间：2018-10-25 18:05

【摘要】：女性作为一个性别群体，有史以来一直处于被评判、被表达的社会文化语境。为了找回自我、确立自身，女性试图以写作的手段来达到自我讲述。但她面临一个巨大的困境：女性能拥有自己的性别话语吗?本文宗旨就是考察女性为了建立自己的性别话语，，采用了什么策略以消解颠覆男权文化中心的话语控制。本文分五个部分分别进行论述。第一部分为女性写作界定和历史，通过界定与历史梳理，明确女性写作的性质和意义，这是讨论女性写作话语策略的前提。第二部分是女性写作话语策略的提出，指出女性早就拥有自己的性别话语，但面临表述方式的转换，正是在这种转换与相连之间，影响了女性写作在话语策略上的选择与运用，但女性写作是完全可能的。因为关于语言的本质、语言的结构、语言与文化权力的关系已有新的认识。第三部分就展开论述女性写作以小叙事消解大叙事的策略。先指出大/小叙事的本质区别，再指出由于时代、思想哲学思潮的影响大叙事已显出虚假而小叙事则己具备不容忽视的颠覆能力。接下来本文就集中挖掘女性写作小叙事的意义以及作为一种策略如何通过改写／重读历史，内聚焦的叙事结构方式显示出对当下男性小叙事的超越，并最终消解男性大叙事。第四部分展开论述女性写作以非法敞开消解男权中心合法遮蔽的叙事策略。先指出男权合法叙事的虚妄与遮蔽，再指出女性写作应以非法敞开加以颠覆，接下来分别具体论述女性写作通过反良母、反贞女、反贤妻的边缘体验消解文化中心对女性的形象界定和价值评判，最后还以感受历史的不同方式指出女性写作躯体化对男性理性化历史的消解意义。第五部分则就女性写作在词语层面消解逻各斯的策略展开论述。首先指出语言在具体运用中是存有缝隙的，话语权力也是可反控制的，因此女性写作完全可以不必顾忌所谓男性语言的限制。接着就围绕女性写作对词语系统——象喻系统的解构和重构及对语法逻辑的倾斜使用肯定了女性写作在具体话语表述上对男权话语权力的有效消解。第六部分是结语。本文力求通过论述肯定女性写作的有效性。
[Abstract]:As a gender group, women have always been judged and expressed in the sociocultural context. In order to find themselves and establish themselves, women try to achieve self-narration by writing. But she faces a huge dilemma: can women have their own gender discourse? The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strategies adopted by women in order to establish their own gender discourse in order to subvert the discourse control of male dominant cultural center. This article is divided into five parts respectively. The first part is the definition and history of female writing, through defining and historical combing, the author clarifies the nature and significance of female writing, which is the premise of discussing the discourse strategy of female writing. In the second part, the author points out that women have their own gender discourse for a long time, but face the change of expression, which affects the choice and application of female writing in discourse strategy. But it is entirely possible for women to write. Because of the nature of language, the structure of language, the relationship between language and cultural power has a new understanding. The third part discusses the strategy of female writing to dispel the big narrative with small narration. This paper first points out the essential difference between big and small narration, and then points out that because of the times, the influence of ideological and philosophical thoughts on big narration has been shown to be false, while the small narrative has the subversive ability that can not be ignored. Then this paper focuses on the significance of female small narration and how to rewrite / reread the history as a strategy. The narrative structure of internal focus shows the transcendence of the current male small narrative and finally dispels the male grand narrative. The fourth part discusses the narrative strategy of female writing. This paper first points out the falsehood and obscurity of the legal narration of male power, then points out that female writing should be subverted by illegal and open, and then discusses the female writing through anti-good mother, anti-virginity, respectively. The anti-virtuous wife's marginal experience dispels the cultural center's definition of female image and value judgment, and finally points out the significance of female writing somatization to the male rational history in different ways of feeling history. The fifth part discusses the strategy of dissolving logos in female writing. Firstly, it is pointed out that there are gaps in the use of language, and the power of speech is also counter-controllable, so female writing can completely avoid the restrictions of so-called male language. Secondly, the deconstruction and reconstruction of the lexical system-figurative system around female writing and the inclined use of grammatical logic affirm the effective elimination of male power in female writing on specific discourse expressions. The sixth part is the conclusion. This paper tries to affirm the validity of female writing.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2001
【分类号】：I04

【引证文献】