文学与革命——对《文学前的马克思》的质疑
发布时间：2019-05-09 14:19
【摘要】：本文试图对艾多阿多·卡达瓦《文学前的马克思》一文中的观点提出质疑:该文的作者一方面强调马克思的历史重要性,另一方面则将后者对历史事件的描述和论述界定为重复。他在力图突出马克思的"文学书写"转向的同时,又将马克思所有的著述都视为"文学"。此外,他依照文学的异质性来对之加以描述,但同时又呼吁要实现作为通向人类自由和未来性终极道路的"文学共同体"。
[Abstract]:This paper attempts to question the point of view in the paper "Marx before Literature": on the one hand, the author emphasizes the historical importance of Marx. On the other hand, the latter's description and discussion of historical events are defined as repetition. While trying to highlight the turn of Marx's literary writing, he regarded all Marx's works as "literature". In addition, he described it according to the heterogeneity of literature, but at the same time called for the realization of the "literary community" as the ultimate road to human freedom and futurism.
【作者单位】： 河南大学翻译理论研究所;
【分类号】：I0-05
，
本文编号：2472827
[Abstract]:This paper attempts to question the point of view in the paper "Marx before Literature": on the one hand, the author emphasizes the historical importance of Marx. On the other hand, the latter's description and discussion of historical events are defined as repetition. While trying to highlight the turn of Marx's literary writing, he regarded all Marx's works as "literature". In addition, he described it according to the heterogeneity of literature, but at the same time called for the realization of the "literary community" as the ultimate road to human freedom and futurism.
【作者单位】： 河南大学翻译理论研究所;
【分类号】：I0-05
，
本文编号：2472827
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2472827.html
