“汉字革命”派语文知识的“选择性错误”——以“东方文化派”对“汉字革命”论的批判为例

发布时间：2017-12-27 15:36

本文关键词：“汉字革命”派语文知识的“选择性错误”——以“东方文化派”对“汉字革命”论的批判为例　出处：《人文杂志》2014年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近代语文运动特别是五四"汉字革命"运动,是一场"将语文还给大众"和"语文现代化"的文化革新运动,其对中国语文乃至中国文化现代转型立下的功绩,理应得到充分肯定。然而,宣传革命理论的同时,运动中也时常出现有意无意的"知识性错误",主要表现在对"言文一致"的错误认识、将文白之争比附为拉丁方言之争、将教育落后之责诿过于汉字等方面。"东方文化"派曾一一指出上述错误之所在。这些常识性错谬,反映了"汉字革命"论者的"意图伦理"。如今重新检视这些问题,有利于对新文化运动得失的深度反思。
[Abstract]:The modern Chinese movement, especially the 54 "Chinese character revolution" movement, is a cultural innovation movement that "returns the language to the masses" and "the modernization of Chinese language". It deserves full recognition of the achievements made in modern transformation of Chinese language and even Chinese culture. However, the theory of revolutionary propaganda at the same time, the movement also often appear "knowledge error" naturally or half unconsciously, mainly in the Genbunitchi mistake, will the battle was mistaken for the Latin dialects of the dispute, the backwardness of education responsibility blaming Chinese characters etc.. The "Oriental Culture" once one by one pointed out the above mistakes. These common errors, reflects the "revolution" Chinese characters "theory of intention ethics". Today, the re examination of these problems is conducive to the deep reflection of the gains and losses of the new cultural movement.
【作者单位】：重庆师范大学图书馆;重庆师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金西部项目“《东方杂志》(1911-1932)与新文学运动的关系研究”(11XZW014)
【分类号】：H1-09
【正文快照】： 1922年,在“国语研究会”会刊《国语月刊》的“汉字改革号”上,钱玄同第一次祭出了“汉字革命”大旗,胡适、黎锦熙、蔡元培、周作人、沈兼士、赵元任、傅斯年等,从汉字存废、字母化以及国语建设方向等层面,分别提出对汉字加以“彻底改革”的意见。其实,作为一场语文运动,它的

【相似文献】