语言的逻辑性与诗歌的“懂”——兼与高玉先生商榷

发布时间：2018-03-02 15:09

本文选题：语言　切入点：逻辑性　出处：《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：语言的意义就存在于逻辑关系中,理性形式与感性内容的统一就是语言意义的最基本的逻辑结构。语言思想本体观同语言思维偏向,同思维、逻辑、认知等具有一致性。反懂如果仅仅停留在反本身,反理性逻辑、反意义唯一等,不解决怎么反就容易误入歧途。语言的多义性并不是有了反懂观念后才产生的,反懂只是一个看待语言的理念问题、视角问题。语言具有逻辑性,文学作品也具有逻辑性,只不过不是传统认为的只有理性逻辑,而是还有感性逻辑,并且感性逻辑在文学创作中占主导地位。理解文学作品应尽可能地接近作者的立意,这也是读书的一种伦理态度。理解文学作品也不能迁就作者的立意而忽视文本语言的逻辑性。把握语言的逻辑性,对分析理解文学创作和欣赏中的懂、非懂、反懂,都很重要。
[Abstract]:The meaning of language exists in the logical relationship. The unity of rational form and perceptual content is the most basic logical structure of language meaning. Cognition and so on have consistency. Anti-understanding is easy to go astray if it only stays in anti-itself, anti-rational logic, anti-meaning and so on. The ambiguity of language does not come into being only after the concept of anti-understanding. Understanding is just a matter of thinking about language, of perspective. Language is logical, and literature is logical, but it is not just rational logic that is traditionally thought of, but perceptual logic. And perceptual logic plays a dominant role in literary creation. Understanding literary works should be as close as possible to the author's intention. This is also an ethical attitude of reading. Understanding literary works can not accommodate the author's intention and ignore the logic of the text language. It is very important to grasp the logic of language to analyze and understand the understanding in literary creation and appreciation, not to understand, not to understand and to understand.
【作者单位】：广西武鸣县审计局办公室;
【分类号】：I052;H0

【相似文献】