查尔莫斯的二维语义学

发布时间：2018-04-10 19:03

本文选题：查尔莫斯 + 二维语义学　；参考：《广西大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：关于心-身问题的哲学研究中有着三个核心概念——意义、理性和模态。通过康德命题、新弗雷格命题以及卡尔纳普命题,这三个人类认识过程中的重要概念联系了起来,这即是黄金三角。而随着克里普克对康德命题中先天必然性的批判,黄金三角就此破裂。但许多哲学家仍然尝试使用意义、理性和模态三个核心概念为基础来解释人类的认知过程,他们实际上发现了问题具有不同的维度。其中斯多纳克揭示了另一个维度的模态的可能；卡普兰发现了先天必然的新联系；埃文斯发现了一种深层的必然性；戴维斯和汉波斯通则通过二维算子的定义扩展了现实世界及可能世界；杰克逊提出了A内涵和C内涵的理论。查尔莫斯提出一个具有普遍意义的二维体系理论,在查尔莫斯的二维语义构建中他将卡尔纳普命题以及新弗雷格命题二维化,从而在一个二维的意义上恢复了黄金三角。查尔莫斯的论述虽然不是很完善,但他至少在某种意义上恢复了黄金三角,或者是说扩展了黄金三角。未来二维语义学的发展具有无限的可能,之前对意义、理性与模态三个概念的探讨实际上应该属于某种无限的语义学中的一部分。而关于人类如何认识外部世界这个问题的解答并不是一劳永逸的,我们实际上无法做出某种有限回答,因为这个问题涉及到认知主体自身。既然认知主体自身中所具有的思想在理论上是无限的,那么反身问道认知主体如何认知这样的问题在理论上也应该可以无限展开。而其中的每一个展开的可能都可以成为一种语义学,并形成一个新的概念三角。
[Abstract]:There are three core concepts in the philosophical study of mind-body-meaning, rationality and mode.Through the Kant proposition, the new Frege proposition and the Rudolf Carnap proposition, the three important concepts in the process of human cognition are connected together, which is called the Golden Triangle.With Kripke's critique of the innate inevitability of Kant's proposition, the Golden Triangle broke down.However, many philosophers still try to explain human cognitive processes based on the three core concepts of meaning, rationality and mode. In fact, they find that problems have different dimensions.Among them, Stokes reveals the possibility of the modal of another dimension, Kaplan discovers the new connection of innate necessity, Evans discovers a kind of deep inevitability.Davis and Hampers expand the real world and possible world through the definition of two-dimensional operators, and Jackson put forward the theory of "A connotation" and "C" connotation.Charmoss put forward a universal theory of two-dimensional system. In the construction of two dimensional semantics of Charmos, he changed the Rudolf Carnap proposition and the new Frege proposition into two dimensions, thus restoring the golden triangle in a two-dimensional sense.Though not perfect, Charmos restored the Golden Triangle at least in a way, or expanded it.In the future, the development of two-dimensional semantics has unlimited possibilities. The discussion of the three concepts of meaning, rationality and mode should actually be part of some infinite semantics.But the answer to the question of how human beings perceive the outside world is not once and for all, and we can't actually give some limited answer because it involves the cognitive subject itself.Since the thought in the cognitive subject itself is infinite in theory, the question of how the cognitive subject can be cognized by the reflexive body should be unbounded in theory.Each of them can become a semantics and form a new concept triangle.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H0-05

【参考文献】