论图像的符号性——驳米切尔图像转向论的“后符号学”命题

发布时间：2018-05-07 05:30

本文选题：图像转向 + 图像符号学　；参考：《社会科学战线》2012年10期

【摘要】：米切尔"图像转向"成为世界性热门话题,并带出了"后符号学"的论题。他提出,符号学已经无法解决基于"像似性"基础上的图像问题。文章从像似性入手,分析了绝似、镜像、副本、重合等极端情况的图像表意,并得出了"像似性并不否定图像的符号性"这一结论。进而推知图像转向并不否定符号学对当代图像研究的有效性。米切尔论点的意义在于,图像研究需要建立一门以当代传媒视觉景观为对象的"图像符号学",而符号学则可借助"图像符号模式"从"语言符号学"更彻底地转向一般文化符号学。
[Abstract]:Mitchell's "Image turn" has become a hot topic in the world, and has brought out the topic of "Post-semiotics". He proposed that semiotics can no longer solve the image problem based on iconicity. Starting with iconicity, this paper analyzes the image ideologies of extreme cases such as iconicity, mirroring, replica and coincidence, and draws the conclusion that iconicity does not negate the symbolism of images. Then we can infer that image turning does not negate the validity of semiotics in contemporary image research. The point of the Mitchell argument is, Image research needs to establish an "image semiotics" which takes the visual landscape of contemporary media as the object, and semiology can turn to general cultural semiotics more thoroughly by means of "image symbol mode" from "language semiotics" to "general cultural semiotics".
【作者单位】：桂林电子科技大学艺术与设计学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目西部项目(11XWW001) 广西哲学社会科学基金项目(11FXW005)
【分类号】：H0

【共引文献】