安徽枞阳话疑问代词研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 08:49

本文选题：枞阳话 + 疑问代词　；参考：《浙江师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文选取枞阳话的疑问代词作为研究对象,疑问代词是枞阳话表达疑问的重要手段之一,全面描写疑问代词具有重要的实践意义。序言部分首先介绍枞阳县的地理历史和人口概况,其次简述枞阳话的声韵调系统,然后综述本题的研究现状,最后说明本题研究方法、语料来源和体例。第二章从问人、问事物、问处所等意义角度构建了枞阳话疑问代词的总体框架,展现了枞阳话疑问代词的概貌。第三至第六章按基本疑问词形的不同分类描写了枞阳话“哪”类、“么1”类、“么2”类、“好”类疑问代词的疑问及非疑问用法。研究表明,枞阳话问人的代词有“洛”和“么人”,“洛”是“哪个”的合音,用于指别,“么人”用于称代；问事物的代词有“么”、“么东西”,二者分别分担了普通话“什么”的部分功能：问数量的有“好多”、“好些”、“几”,“好多”倾向于主观增量,“好些”倾向于主观减量,“几”一般只用来问少于十的数量；问原因、目的的有“么话”、“么事”、“么账”和“既”、“自”,其中,“么话”倾向于问客观原因,“么事”倾向于问主观目的,“么账”的发展尚不成熟,受句法结构的限制,“既”表达消极的主观情态,“自”表示反驳；问方式的有“么”和“么因”,二者的功能之和相当于普通话的“怎么”；问时间的有“么会子”和“好会子”,其中“么会子”问时间点,“好会子”问时间段；问地点的有“哪”、“哪块”和“哪辽”,“哪块”倾向于问面状地点,“哪辽”倾向于问条带状地点；问程度的有“好”和“多”,“好”的频率远高于“多”,也更地道；问性状的是“么样”和“么号”,其中,“么样”问事物的状态,“么号”问事物的性质。第七章从方言之间疑问代词比较的角度讨论枞阳话归属问题,通过与江淮官话洪巢片的南京话、扬州话、合肥话以及黄孝片的黄冈话、安陆话等作比较,认为枞阳话的疑问代词更接近黄孝片,因此,建议将枞阳方言划归江淮官话黄孝片。
[Abstract]:This paper selects interrogative pronouns in Zongyang dialect as the object of study. Interrogative pronouns are one of the important means of expressing interrogations in Zongyang dialect. It is of great practical significance to describe interrogative pronouns comprehensively. The preface first introduces the geographical history and population situation of Zongyang County, then briefly describes the phonological tone system of Zongyang dialect, then summarizes the present research situation of this topic, and finally explains the research method, the source of the corpus and the style of the subject. The second chapter constructs the general frame of the interrogative pronouns of Zongyang dialect from the point of view of asking people, asking things, asking places and so on, and presents the general picture of interrogative pronouns in Zongyang dialect. The third to sixth chapters describe the interrogative and non-interrogative usages of Zongyang dialect according to the different classification of the basic interrogative words' forms, such as "which kind", "Mo-1", "Mo2" and "good". Studies have shown that the pronouns asked by Zongyang dialect include "Luo" and "Mo person", "Luo" is a combination of "what", used to refer to another, "what person" is used to refer to another, and the pronouns of things have "what", "what thing", They share some of the functions of "what" in Putonghua: the number of questions is "many", "better", "several", "many" tend to be subjective increment, "better" tends to subjective reduction, "Ji" is generally used to ask less than ten, and the reasons are "what words", "what things", "what accounts" and "self", among which, "what words" tend to ask objective reasons, "what things" tend to ask subjective purposes, The development of "Mo Zhang" is still immature, restricted by syntactic structure, "not only" expresses negative subjective modality, "self" means refutation, but there are "do" and "Mo-cause", the sum of their functions is equivalent to "how" of Putonghua; Those who ask about time are "what will children" and "good meeting children", in which "no meeting children" ask time points, "good meeting children" ask time periods; those who ask places have "what", "which pieces" and "what Liao", and "which" tend to ask face like places? "Naliao" tends to ask about banded locations; the degree of questioning is "good" and "more", and the frequency of "good" is much higher than "more" and more authentic; and those who ask for characters are "Mo" and "what", in which, "what" asks about the state of things, The name asks about the nature of things. The seventh chapter discusses the attribution of Zongyang dialect from the perspective of the comparison of interrogative pronouns between dialects, and compares it with the Nanjing dialect, Yangzhou dialect, Hefei dialect, Huanggang dialect and Anlu dialect. It is considered that the interrogative pronouns in Zongyang dialect are more similar to Huang Xiaobian, so it is suggested that Zongyang dialect be classified as Huang Xiaobian in Jianghuai official dialect.
【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H172.4

【参考文献】