伦敦奥运会英汉体育新闻报道的及物和态度资源对比分析

发布时间：2018-06-07 09:24

本文选题：及物系统 + 评价理论　；参考：《东北师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：由Halliday提出的三大元功能，即概念功能、人际功能和语篇功能，为语篇分析提供了有效的理论体系，Martin提出的评价理论正是为进一步研究人际功能提供了更完善的理论框架，也为功能语言学研究提供了新的发展思路。评价理论包含三个子系统，即态度系统、介入系统和级差系统，态度子系统还可划分为情感、判断和鉴赏，而本文主要采用三大元功能和态度系统为理论框架，从人民日报网站和外国知名网站上分别各自选取了30篇伦敦奥运会英汉体育新闻报道，采用定量和定性的研究方法阐述问题。本文包含六个篇章结构，第一章简述研究背景、研究意义、文章的框架结构和研究问题，第二章阐述了国内外评价理论研究现状以及概述了三大元功能和评价系统的理论框架，第三章介绍了研究方法和数据的收集，第四章进行数据分析，第五章是案例分析，进一步阐述英汉体育新闻报道及物性系统和态度资源的分析结果，第六章总结研究的结果和阐述本文的局限性和未来发展方向。通过本文研究发现的结论如下： (1)及物系统中，英汉物质过程皆为主要过程，其次是关系过程、行为过程、心理过程、言语过程、存在过程，人民日报的物质过程多于英国卫报，中国媒体更加注重描述体育事件本身以保持体育新闻报道的客观性。 (2)态度评价系统中，英汉媒体在评价策略的使用上存在差异，首先从态度资源的数量上来看，英国媒体使用了更多的态度资源；其次从态度资源的来源上看，英语体育报道中使用了更多的作者情感资源，汉语体育报道中使用了更多的非作者情感资源；最后从态度资源的分布上来看，英汉判断和鉴赏资源使用频率皆超过了情感资源，中国新闻报道者更多的使用了鉴赏资源，而外国新闻报道者使用了更多的判断资源，具体到各子资源的使用上，中国体育新闻报道者比外国报道者更多的使用了社会尊重，中国媒体倾向于使用价值鉴赏资源，外国媒体倾向于使用反应鉴赏资源。 (3)造成中西方及物系统和评价策略使用不同的主要原因是中西方不同的社会文化价值，中国属于集体主义国家，，倾向于维持和谐的人际关系和社会关系，在评论时往往采取委婉的方式进行表达，而西方崇尚个人主义文化，注重言论自由，往往采取直接和开放的言论方式。
[Abstract]:The three metafunctions put forward by Halliday, namely conceptual function, interpersonal function and textual function, provide an effective theoretical system for discourse analysis. It also provides a new way of development for the study of functional linguistics. The theory of evaluation includes three subsystems: attitude system, intervention system and differential system. Attitude subsystem can also be divided into emotion, judgment and appreciation. In this paper, three metafunctions and attitude systems are used as the theoretical framework. From the People's Daily website and the famous foreign websites, 30 articles of sports news reports on the London Olympic Games were selected respectively, and the quantitative and qualitative research methods were used to expound the problems. The first chapter briefly describes the research background, the significance, the frame structure and the research issues of the article. The second chapter describes the current situation of the domestic and foreign evaluation theory and summarizes the three meta-functions and the theoretical framework of the evaluation system. The third chapter introduces the research methods and data collection, the fourth chapter carries on the data analysis, the fifth chapter is the case analysis, further elaborated the English and Chinese sports news report and the materiality system and the attitude resources analysis result, The sixth chapter summarizes the research results and expounds the limitations and future development direction of this paper. The conclusions are as follows: (1) in transitive systems, the material processes in English and Chinese are the main processes, followed by relational processes, behavioral processes, psychological processes, speech processes, existential processes, and the People's Daily material processes are more than those of the British Guardian. Chinese media pay more attention to describing sports events in order to maintain the objectivity of sports news reports. (2) in the attitude evaluation system, there are differences in the use of evaluation strategies between English and Chinese media. Firstly, from the perspective of the quantity of attitude resources, the British media use more attitude resources, and secondly, from the perspective of the source of attitude resources. More author affective resources are used in English sports reports and more non-author affective resources are used in Chinese sports reports. Finally, judging and appreciating resources in English and Chinese are used more frequently than affective resources in terms of the distribution of attitude resources. Chinese news reporters use more appreciation resources, while foreign news reporters use more judgment resources. Specifically, in terms of the use of various sub-resources, Chinese sports news reporters use social respect more than foreign reporters. Chinese media tend to use value appreciation resources, while foreign media tend to use reaction appreciation resources. 3) the main reason for the different use of Chinese and Western transitive systems and evaluation strategies is the different social and cultural values between China and the West. China is a collectivist country and tends to maintain harmonious interpersonal and social relations. In comments, euphemism is often adopted, while in the West individualism culture is advocated, freedom of speech is emphasized, and direct and open speech is often adopted.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：G212;H15;H315

【参考文献】