关于量词“个”用法的调查分析

发布时间：2018-06-12 21:35

本文选题：个 + “V+个+NP”结构　；参考：《天津师范大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：“个”是现代汉语量词体系中使用范围最广、使用频率最高的一个量词。从历史看,“个”一开始就是量词；自古至今,一方面它继续保持着量词的性质和用法,一方面却也出现其表量功能逐渐淡化即一般称为虚化的情况。论文以较为丰赡的语料为基础,对量词“个”的多方面的用法特点进行了较为详尽的分析。具体说来,论文的工作约有三个方面：一,对“个”的来源、历史演化和目前的研究现状进行梳理,阐明分析思路；其二,对较能表现量词“个”的个性特点的“V+个+NP”和“V+个+VP”两种语法结构分别进行考察,指出NP前的量词“个”多不表示实际量,VP前的量词“个”只起标记宾语的作用；其三,讨论现代汉语量词“个”的泛用现象,指出泛用同时亦需接受语法制约,使汉语量词体系得以维系而不致受到破坏。
[Abstract]:"GE" is the most widely used and frequently used classifier in modern Chinese quantifier system. From the historical point of view, the "individual" is a classifier at the beginning; on the one hand, it maintains the nature and usage of the quantifier, on the other hand, it also appears that the function of the quantification is gradually desalinated, that is, it is generally called nihilization. Based on the abundant corpus, this paper makes a detailed analysis of the usage characteristics of the classifier "individual". Specifically, the work of the thesis has three aspects: first, the source of "individual", historical evolution and current research status, to clarify the analysis ideas; second, The two grammatical structures of "V NP" and "V VP", which can express the personality characteristics of quantifier "individual", are investigated separately, and it is pointed out that the "many" quantifiers before NP do not mean that the quantifier "individual" before the actual measure VP only serves as a marker object. Thirdly, this paper discusses the universal use of the classifier "individual" in modern Chinese, and points out that it is necessary to accept the grammatical restriction at the same time, so that the Chinese quantifier system can be maintained without being destroyed.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】