《为狱等状四种》中的“吏议”与“邦亡”

发布时间：2018-06-25 05:13

  本文选题：《为狱等状四种》 + 吏议　； 参考：《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年04期

【摘要】：整理者认为《为狱等状四种》中"吏议"的主体为县吏,然县吏似无权参与案件的审判,而直接听命于郡守的都吏是有断狱和向廷尉奏谳的权力的,故"吏议"之主体当为都吏。一般认为"邦亡"指逃出国境,然从《癸、琐相移谋购案》可知秦人逃亡到南郡被定为"邦亡"罪,而案发时南郡早已划入秦版图之中,故知"邦亡"当为逃离秦故地,而非逃离国境。"邦亡"是一定历史时期内秦国特有的称谓,秦统一后该词未见于文献之中。
[Abstract]:The collators thought that the main body of the "officials' discussion" in "prison" was county officials, but the county officials did not seem to have the right to participate in the trial of the case, and the city officials who directly obeyed the county guards had the power to break the prison and to play to the court lieutenant. Therefore, the subject of "official discussion" should be all officials. It is generally believed that "state death" refers to escaping out of the country, but from the "Gui, the case of seeking purchase by shifting each other", it can be seen that the Qin people were convicted of "state death" when they fled to south county, and the south county had already been included in the Qin territory at the time of the crime, so it was known that "state death" should be used to escape the land of Qin Dynasty. Instead of fleeing the country. " "the death of a State" is a special appellation of Qin State in a certain historical period, which was not found in the literature after the unification of Qin Dynasty.
【作者单位】： 湖南大学岳麓书院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目“岳麓秦简与秦代法律制度研究”(11JZD013)
【分类号】：H131

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 陈松长;;睡虎地秦简中的“将阳”小考[J];湖南大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期

2 于振波;;秦律令中的“新黔首”与“新地吏”[J];中国史研究;2009年03期

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 沈晋贤;从巫祝用“土”到以“土”为药论——兼论马王堆医书巫祝用土[J];安徽大学学报;2004年06期

2 刘信芳;;古文字歧读释例[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年05期

3 张振谦;;齐系陶文考释[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期

4 刘晓满;卜宪群;;秦汉行政中的效率规定与问责[J];安徽史学;2012年02期

5 陈晶;;对秦简中赀甲盾缴纳形式的再认识[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年02期

6 刘莉;;论《包山楚简》133号简文“诰”字的改释[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期

7 杨宗兵;里耶秦简县“守”、“丞”、“守丞”同义说[J];北方论丛;2004年06期

8 于，

本文编号：2064744