当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 语言学论文 >

基于成绩分析的新HSK纸笔考试和网络考试比较研究

发布时间:2018-09-03 20:48
【摘要】:随着汉语推广事业在全世界的不断深入,新汉语水平考试(HSK)作为教学评估、留学和晋升的重要依据,现如今已成为发展成熟的、面向世界的一项语言能力测试。为了适应多媒体社会的不断发展,汉办在推广纸笔考试的基础上,于2010年11月又推出了新汉语水平考试的网络考试形式。新HSK网络考试采用和纸笔考试相同的试卷内容、分数及答题时间,但在试题呈现方式和作答方式上采用计算机形式。面对每年大幅度递增的考生数据,公平、可信、有效的考试形式显得尤为重要。新HSK的网络考试形式为考生和院校提供了新的选择和更多的便利,但有关对新HSK纸笔考试和网络考试的比较研究以及两种不同的考试媒介是否对考生的成绩产生不同影响等方面还缺少相关的理论研究。本文针对2014年参加新HSK纸笔考试和网络考试的考生数据,筛选出了考生量较大的29场考试样本,通过社会科学统计软件SPSS对所有考生的成绩进行了整体和部分的分析。分析结果显示,总体上网络考试的成绩高于纸笔考试,其中听力和写作部分网络成绩较高的情况比较明显,而阅读部分中两种考试形式的成绩差异不明显。本文认为,网络考试中使用耳麦进行听力可能是导致网络考试听力分数较高的原因;阅读部分纸笔和网络考试差异不大可能与读者的阅读习惯相关;写作部分中,键盘输入方法与多媒体环境下的交际方式(如手机、电脑)等相似,这可能是导致考生网络考试写作成绩较高的原因。随着考生数据和信息的不断增加、考试自身的不断完善,对新HSK纸笔考试和网络考试的比较关系的分析研究将更加完善、精准,希望本文能为后者的相关研究提供参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of Chinese promotion in the world, the New Chinese proficiency Test (HSK), as an important basis for teaching evaluation, study abroad and promotion, has now become a mature and world-oriented language proficiency test. In order to adapt to the continuous development of multimedia society, on the basis of popularizing the paper and pen examinations, the Chinese Office of China introduced the new Chinese proficiency examination network test form in November 2010. The new HSK network test adopts the same content, scores and answering time as the paper and pen test, but it adopts the computer form in presenting and answering the test questions. In the face of increasing examinee data every year, fair, credible and effective examination form is particularly important. The new HSK online exam form provides candidates and colleges with new choices and more convenience. However, there is still a lack of relevant theoretical research on the comparative study of the new HSK paper and pen test and the network test, and whether the two different examination media have different effects on the test results. Based on the test data of the new HSK paper and pen examination and the network examination in 2014, 29 test samples with large number of examinees are screened out in this paper. The results of all the candidates are analyzed in whole and in part through the social science statistical software SPSS. The results show that the results of the online examination are higher than those of the pen and paper tests on the whole, among which the higher scores of the listening and writing parts are obvious, but there is no significant difference between the two kinds of test forms in the reading part. This paper holds that the use of headset for listening in online examinations may be the reason for higher listening scores in online examinations; the differences between some reading papers and pens and online examinations are unlikely to be related to readers' reading habits; in the writing part, The keyboard input method is similar to the communication methods (such as mobile phone, computer) in multimedia environment, which may be the reason for the higher score of examinee's online examination writing. With the increasing of examinee data and information and the improvement of the examination itself, the analysis and research on the comparative relationship between the new HSK paper and pen examination and the network test will be more perfect and accurate. I hope this paper can provide reference and reference for the related research of the latter.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:H195

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 符华均;张晋军;李佩泽;张铁英;解妮妮;;新汉语水平考试HSK(六级)的性别公平性评估[J];考试研究;2014年01期

2 崔瑞国;李兰皋;王雪松;;机考与纸笔考英语阅读成绩等效性研究[J];河北企业;2014年11期

3 金艳;;计算机化语言测试的效度研究——浅析计算机能力与测试构念的关系[J];外语电化教学;2012年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 张云帆;HSK和TOEFL的比较[D];苏州大学;2012年



本文编号:2221122

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2221122.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b855a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com