目的原则下的法庭问答互动中话语标记语的研究
发布时间：2018-10-12 21:09
【摘要】：话语标记语的研究是近来语言学研究十分关注的课题之一。法庭问答互动中话语标记语的研究可以将法律语言学与语用学结合，法律语言学和社会语言学结合，从理论到应用研究，是一个新领域和新思路，为话语标记语的研究提供了一个新视角。这样有助于从理论上重新认识话语标记语这类语言结构在言语交际中的主要作用，改变仅仅从句法-语义的层面对语言结构进行分析的传统研究习惯，结合当今语言学的最新研究成果对其展开分析具有理论上的先进性、及时性，能够与国外的相关研究保持同步。 本文以法庭问答互动中的话语标记语为核心概念，，在以目的原则为主要理论指导和关联理论为辅助理论指导下，通过文献综述法和对3场法庭审判案例语料的定性分析，旨在探讨(1)法庭问答互动中话语标记语的可操作性定义、特点、分类和功能。(2)法庭问答互动中所有参与人如何使用话语标记语在不同的目的关系和互动中实现其话语目的的。(3)话语标记语在社会应用中的实践价值。 文章分为六个章节。第一章介绍了本文的写作背景，目的及意义，语料来源和研究方法。第二章通过文献综述介绍了话语标记语的研究现状。第三章介绍了本文的两个理论，目的原则和关联理论对话语标记语的解释。第四章对法庭问答互动中的话语标记语进行了可操作性定义、提出了3种特点、5种类别和3种功能。第五章主要通过具体例子，分析了法庭问答互动中的话语标记语在目的原则和关联理论指导下的具体应用，其中包括：参与人如何使用话语标记语在不同的目的关系和互动中实现其话语目的；5类话语标记语在法庭问答互动中具体功能表现。最后一章得出相关结论，研究法庭话语从话语标记语入手具有较强的可行性。参与者目的的不同，所选的话语标记语也会不同。使用话语标记语是目的驱使的，受到目的关系和目的互动的制约。恰当使用标记语，可以极大增强话语的关联性，增强语境效果，促进和指导听话人寻求最佳关联，进而有效解决法庭问答互动中听说双方听说和理解的障碍，达到双方的目的，促进庭审的顺利进行。
[Abstract]:The study of discourse markers is one of the most important topics in recent linguistic studies. The study of discourse markers in the interaction of questions and answers in court can combine legal linguistics with pragmatics, legal linguistics with sociolinguistics, from theory to application, which is a new field and new thinking. It provides a new perspective for the study of discourse markers. This will help us to reunderstand the main role of discourse markers in verbal communication and change the traditional research habit of analyzing language structures only from the syntactic and semantic levels. Combining with the latest research results of linguistics today, it has the advantage of theoretical advancement and timeliness, and can keep pace with the related research abroad. Under the guidance of the Skopos principle and the relevance Theory, this paper takes the discourse markers as the core concept, through the literature review method and the qualitative analysis of the corpus of three court cases, under the guidance of the Skopos principle and the relevance Theory. The purpose of this study is to explore (1) the operational definition and characteristics of discourse markers in court question and answer interaction. (2) how all participants use discourse markers to achieve their utterances in different teleological relationships and interactions. (3) the practical value of discourse markers in social application. The article is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the writing background, purpose and significance, corpus sources and research methods. Chapter two introduces the research status of discourse markers by literature review. Chapter three introduces the two theories, Skopos principle and relevance Theory. In chapter 4, the author defines the utterances in the interaction of court questions and answers, and puts forward three kinds of features, five categories and three functions. Chapter five analyzes the application of discourse markers under the guidance of Skopos principle and relevance Theory through concrete examples. These include: how participants use discourse markers to achieve their utterances in different teleological relationships and interactions, and how five types of discourse markers perform their specific functions in the interaction of court questions and answers. The last chapter draws the conclusion that it is feasible to study court discourse from discourse markers. Participants will choose different discourse markers for different purposes. The use of discourse markers is driven by purpose and restricted by the interaction of purpose and purpose. The proper use of markers can greatly enhance the relevance of the discourse, enhance the contextual effect, promote and guide the hearer to seek the best relevance, and then effectively solve the obstacles of listening, hearing and understanding between the two sides in the court question and answer interaction, so as to achieve the purpose of both sides. To facilitate the smooth conduct of the trial.
【学位授予单位】：湖北工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H030
[Abstract]:The study of discourse markers is one of the most important topics in recent linguistic studies. The study of discourse markers in the interaction of questions and answers in court can combine legal linguistics with pragmatics, legal linguistics with sociolinguistics, from theory to application, which is a new field and new thinking. It provides a new perspective for the study of discourse markers. This will help us to reunderstand the main role of discourse markers in verbal communication and change the traditional research habit of analyzing language structures only from the syntactic and semantic levels. Combining with the latest research results of linguistics today, it has the advantage of theoretical advancement and timeliness, and can keep pace with the related research abroad. Under the guidance of the Skopos principle and the relevance Theory, this paper takes the discourse markers as the core concept, through the literature review method and the qualitative analysis of the corpus of three court cases, under the guidance of the Skopos principle and the relevance Theory. The purpose of this study is to explore (1) the operational definition and characteristics of discourse markers in court question and answer interaction. (2) how all participants use discourse markers to achieve their utterances in different teleological relationships and interactions. (3) the practical value of discourse markers in social application. The article is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the writing background, purpose and significance, corpus sources and research methods. Chapter two introduces the research status of discourse markers by literature review. Chapter three introduces the two theories, Skopos principle and relevance Theory. In chapter 4, the author defines the utterances in the interaction of court questions and answers, and puts forward three kinds of features, five categories and three functions. Chapter five analyzes the application of discourse markers under the guidance of Skopos principle and relevance Theory through concrete examples. These include: how participants use discourse markers to achieve their utterances in different teleological relationships and interactions, and how five types of discourse markers perform their specific functions in the interaction of court questions and answers. The last chapter draws the conclusion that it is feasible to study court discourse from discourse markers. Participants will choose different discourse markers for different purposes. The use of discourse markers is driven by purpose and restricted by the interaction of purpose and purpose. The proper use of markers can greatly enhance the relevance of the discourse, enhance the contextual effect, promote and guide the hearer to seek the best relevance, and then effectively solve the obstacles of listening, hearing and understanding between the two sides in the court question and answer interaction, so as to achieve the purpose of both sides. To facilitate the smooth conduct of the trial.
【学位授予单位】：湖北工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H030
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄大网;话语标记研究综述[J];福建外语;2001年01期
2 何自然,莫爱屏;话语标记语与语用照应[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2002年01期
3 陆少兵;;话语标记语“you know”在法庭话语中的作用[J];三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版);2008年S2期
4 张丽萍;;论法庭情境中话语标记语——从法庭话语中的“我(们)认为”谈起[J];南京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
5 冉永平;话语标记语的语用学研究综述[J];外语研究;2000年04期
6 毛凤凡;;法庭讯问中的模糊限制语引发的语用冲突及其对法庭审判的启示[J];外语研究;2006年02期
7 许静;;法庭话语中话语标记语的顺应性动态研究[J];外语研究;2009年06期
8 胡桂丽;;目的原则下的刑事审判话语标记语研究[J];外语学刊;2009年04期
9 许静;;话语标记语的元语用功能[J];山东外语教学;2007年04期
10 陈铭浩;张s
本文编号：2267602
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2267602.html
