语言的界限与世界的界限—可说与不可说理论之宗教启示探究
[Abstract]:Wittgenstein put forward the theory of saying and unspeakable in the Theory of logical philosophy, that is, language divides the boundary between utterable and unspeakable. This kind of theory not only reflects Wittgenstein's philosophical thinking about language and the world from the perspective of the boundary between language and the world. It also reflects Wittgenstein's concern and anxiety about religion when he is engaged in philosophical research. This paper focuses on the theory of saying and not saying, and tries to understand Wittgenstein's theory of saying and saying through the boundary of language and the world, and to understand Wittgenstein's philosophy of language and the world. Understanding Wittgenstein's religious anxiety and trying to establish a possible link between Wittgenstein's philosophy. Wittgenstein's philosophy can be divided into two stages: early philosophy represented by logical philosophy and later philosophy represented by philosophical study. It is well known that Wittgenstein's philosophical ideas in the former and later periods have marked differences in specific aspects. However, the question of whether its philosophical thoughts are completely different or connected with each other in the past and later periods is thought-provoking. The main point of this paper is that Wittgenstein's theory of sayability and immutability not only has the important significance related to his view of language and world view but also provides a link for his philosophical thoughts in his later period. In order to establish the main point of view, the thesis reviews the development of Wittgenstein's philosophy, briefly introduces his life, and reviews the recent research situation of Wittgenstein at home and abroad. In particular, research on the theory of unspeakability, linguistic boundaries and religion. Secondly, the thesis tries to clarify the important concepts of saying and unspeakable in logical philosophy in order to explore the boundary between saying and unspeakable in Wittgenstein, which is in fact the boundary of language. The paper also puts forward some opinions about the boundary of my language is the boundary of my world. In the course of exploring the religious meaning and religious meaning of the theory of saying and unspeakable we find that there are many interesting connections between Wittgenstein's philosophy and religion. First of all, the seven chapters of logical philosophy are similar to the Genesis of the Seven days in the Bible. Secondly, Wittgenstein draws the boundary between saying and unspeakable, which is also closely related to religion. Finally, Wittgenstein's "I" in "my language Boundary is my World Boundary" has the meaning of "I" as the subject of school, the force of this subject is similar to the force of the awesome will of God, unassailable and insurmountable.
【学位授予单位】:福建师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H0
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王国华;;从逻辑图像论到语言游戏说——维特根斯坦语言哲学思想探讨[J];北方论丛;2008年02期
2 唐莹;;基于不同“生活形式”之上的社会方言——对“网络语言”作浅析[J];北方文学(下半月);2012年05期
3 马凌燕;;维特根斯坦语言游戏说的艺术探索[J];长城;2010年10期
4 高歌;;言语行为理论:后期维特根斯坦哲学思想的折射[J];浙江传媒学院学报;2011年03期
5 范连义;;“语言共性”与“家族相似性”——维特根斯坦和乔姆斯基语言哲学思想比较研究之一[J];外语教学理论与实践;2011年01期
6 廖彦婷;;从原型范畴理论看委婉语和禁忌语[J];重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
7 冯志国;于丹;;维特根斯坦“语言游戏”的修辞哲学意蕴[J];东北大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
8 阳建勋;邓成明;;论“经济法责任”研究的语言学转向[J];河北法学;2011年03期
9 庞楠;;心理概念的生活复归——对维特根斯坦《哲学研究》意欲—行动关系的再思考[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2009年08期
10 李佳畅;;从“语言游戏”说论翻译[J];韩山师范学院学报;2009年04期
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 郑霞;“没有新的语言就没有新的世界”—巴赫曼小说中的语言批判与维特根斯坦的语言批判哲学[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
2 樊安;英美法理学中的整体性问题[D];吉林大学;2011年
3 唐玉斌;自我与他人心灵的逻辑哲学探究[D];西南大学;2011年
4 于晓晶;后哲学文化为基础的学校音乐教育[D];南京师范大学;2011年
5 李包庚;马克思和维特根斯坦哲学革命路向的比较研究[D];苏州大学;2011年
6 李明;在美学的转捩点上[D];复旦大学;2006年
7 刘占峰;解释与心灵的本质[D];华中师范大学;2007年
8 龙小平;可能世界中的名称和同一性[D];西南大学;2007年
9 李菁;海德格尔与维特根斯坦存在思想的一种尝试比较[D];浙江大学;2008年
10 尚晓明;人和世界语境中的言语行为建构与透视研究[D];上海外国语大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 丁思佳;母语习得的方式在第二语言学习中的意义和作用[D];首都师范大学;2011年
2 雷忠;维特根斯坦的逻辑图像论探究[D];西南大学;2011年
3 郭s,
本文编号:2275102
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2275102.html