郭德纲相声语言中的反讽研究
发布时间：2018-10-24 15:25
【摘要】：反讽理论是来自于古希腊的一种修辞学，从古至今引起了社会各个方面的专家的极大关注，总结起来主要是集中在文学、语言学、心理学甚至是哲学方面的领域。自上世纪50、60年代以来，人们在文学及语言学的修辞学领域里研究较多，并且出现了许多比较有权威的理论学说，像是Muecke三分说和Fish动态假设等学说。总结起来，反讽理论主要体现在：从说话的表层语义之外，来让听者能够进行深入的理性思考。通过不断从各个领域的深入探讨，使这一理论得到了不断的发展和更新。在语言学上，人们总是在想办法解答“为什么会有这种不符合日常用语的语言形式存在”。但是，，人们对这一理论，总是很难界定一个比较统一的识别标志或判定的标准。[1]国外的反讽理论研究较多，而国内之前的反讽研究多是以文学作品为研究的对象，却很少在幽默语言尤其是相声语言中去理解反讽的语用功能。因此，本文将从修辞学的角度去分析反讽理论在传统声语言中的应用。 本文会选取郭德纲代表的新式传统相声语言为研究对象，对他在网络上流传较广的70余段相声进行了比较深入的研究。从修辞和语用的角度对郭德纲相声语言中的反讽理论进行分析，并试图揭示出反讽理论在郭德纲相声语言中的构成、语用特色、艺术表现心理机制以及对相声语言制造笑料因素的构成所起的重要作用。从而丰富了以相声语言为蓝本的反讽理论的研究情况。
[Abstract]:Irony theory is a kind of rhetoric from ancient Greece, which has attracted great attention from experts in all aspects of society since ancient times. In conclusion, it is mainly concentrated in the fields of literature, linguistics, psychology and even philosophy. Since the 1950s and 1960s, there have been many researches in the field of rhetoric in literature and linguistics, and many authoritative theories have emerged, such as Muecke theory and Fish dynamic hypothesis. To sum up, irony theory is mainly embodied in: from the surface semantics of speech, to enable the listener to conduct in-depth rational thinking. This theory has been continuously developed and updated through the in-depth discussion in various fields. Linguistically, people are always trying to figure out why there are such forms of language that are not in line with everyday language. However, it is always difficult for people to define a relatively uniform identification mark or criterion for this theory. [1] there are more studies on irony theory in foreign countries, while most of the previous studies in China have focused on literary works. However, the pragmatic functions of irony are seldom understood in humorous language, especially in crosstalk language. Therefore, this paper will analyze the application of irony theory in traditional acoustic language from the perspective of rhetoric. This article will select Guo Degang's new traditional crosstalk language as the research object, has carried on the thorough research to his more than 70 paragraphs crosstalk which has been widely spread on the network. From the perspective of rhetoric and pragmatics, this paper analyzes the irony theory in Guo Degang's cross talk language, and tries to reveal the composition and pragmatic characteristics of the irony theory in the cross talk language of Guo Degang. The psychological mechanism of artistic expression and its important role in the making of comic dialogue language. It enriches the research of irony theory based on crosstalk language.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H15
本文编号：2291763
[Abstract]:Irony theory is a kind of rhetoric from ancient Greece, which has attracted great attention from experts in all aspects of society since ancient times. In conclusion, it is mainly concentrated in the fields of literature, linguistics, psychology and even philosophy. Since the 1950s and 1960s, there have been many researches in the field of rhetoric in literature and linguistics, and many authoritative theories have emerged, such as Muecke theory and Fish dynamic hypothesis. To sum up, irony theory is mainly embodied in: from the surface semantics of speech, to enable the listener to conduct in-depth rational thinking. This theory has been continuously developed and updated through the in-depth discussion in various fields. Linguistically, people are always trying to figure out why there are such forms of language that are not in line with everyday language. However, it is always difficult for people to define a relatively uniform identification mark or criterion for this theory. [1] there are more studies on irony theory in foreign countries, while most of the previous studies in China have focused on literary works. However, the pragmatic functions of irony are seldom understood in humorous language, especially in crosstalk language. Therefore, this paper will analyze the application of irony theory in traditional acoustic language from the perspective of rhetoric. This article will select Guo Degang's new traditional crosstalk language as the research object, has carried on the thorough research to his more than 70 paragraphs crosstalk which has been widely spread on the network. From the perspective of rhetoric and pragmatics, this paper analyzes the irony theory in Guo Degang's cross talk language, and tries to reveal the composition and pragmatic characteristics of the irony theory in the cross talk language of Guo Degang. The psychological mechanism of artistic expression and its important role in the making of comic dialogue language. It enriches the research of irony theory based on crosstalk language.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H15
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张新祥;曹雨婕;;从郭德纲相声看中国相声幽默对语用原则的偏离[J];读与写(教育教学刊);2009年02期
2 高玉兰;格赖斯会话含意理论与相声语言艺术[J];淮北煤师院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年02期
3 陈金中;;相声幽默言语的“前景化”探析[J];淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年03期
4 王燕;从关联理论看幽默话语的关联特质[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2005年03期
5 龙德银;;反讽话语说话人的意向及其常规推理[J];河北理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
6 朱小舟;反讽的语用研究[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2002年03期
7 刘曲洋;;相声“包袱”的语用解读[J];牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年06期
8 池昌海;相声“包袱”构拟与语用“合作原则”偏离[J];南昌大学学报(社会科学版);1997年02期
9 卢兆泉;《红楼梦》反讽艺术初探[J];杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版);1989年04期
10 涂靖;反讽的语用特征和限制条件[J];外语学刊;2002年01期
本文编号：2291763
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2291763.html
