现代汉语词类划分标准研究
发布时间：2019-02-16 02:53
【摘要】：要解决词类划分的问题，首先要解决的是标准问题，本文探讨了现代汉语词类划分中的理论标准与实际标准不一致的问题。通过对比不同教材，详细分析了每一个词类的特点，特别是语法功能，，探讨了各家在理论上存在的一致和分歧之处，区分了现代汉语词类划分的理论标准与事实使用的实际标准。发现理论标准与事实标准之间存在较大出入，有的词类完全是按意义或语用标准划分的，一些误解、分歧与之密切相关。从而提出了尊重事实或统一标准的不同方案，希望能为解决词类划分问题提供参考。
[Abstract]:In order to solve the problem of classification of parts of speech, the first problem is standard. This paper discusses the inconsistency between the theoretical standard and the practical standard in the division of parts of speech in modern Chinese. By comparing different teaching materials, this paper analyzes in detail the characteristics of each part of speech, especially the grammatical function, and probes into the differences and differences in theory. This paper distinguishes the theoretical standard of classification of parts of speech from the practical standard of factual use in modern Chinese. It is found that there is a great difference between the theoretical standard and the factual standard, and some parts of speech are totally classified according to the meaning or pragmatic standard, and some misunderstandings and differences are closely related to it. Different schemes of respecting facts or unifying standards are put forward, which can provide reference for solving the problem of classification of parts of speech.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146
本文编号：2423972
[Abstract]:In order to solve the problem of classification of parts of speech, the first problem is standard. This paper discusses the inconsistency between the theoretical standard and the practical standard in the division of parts of speech in modern Chinese. By comparing different teaching materials, this paper analyzes in detail the characteristics of each part of speech, especially the grammatical function, and probes into the differences and differences in theory. This paper distinguishes the theoretical standard of classification of parts of speech from the practical standard of factual use in modern Chinese. It is found that there is a great difference between the theoretical standard and the factual standard, and some parts of speech are totally classified according to the meaning or pragmatic standard, and some misunderstandings and differences are closely related to it. Different schemes of respecting facts or unifying standards are put forward, which can provide reference for solving the problem of classification of parts of speech.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 沈家煊;;“名动词”的反思:问题和对策[J];世界汉语教学;2012年01期
2 马彪;;运用统计法进行词类划界的一个尝试[J];中国语文;1994年05期
本文编号：2423972
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2423972.html
