转喻的认知语用研究
发布时间：2019-05-28 14:32
【摘要】：随着认知语言学的发展，转喻不仅被视为一种修辞手法，也成为一种思考和行动的基本方式。这是一种认知过程，在这一过程中，人们使用突出和重要的部分来代表整体或整体的一部分，或者选择整体作为完全形态来代表其部分之一。本文从认知和语用语言学的角度，对转喻进行了描述，并讨论了转喻的认知和语用动机以及语用功能。笔者通过扩散激活模型和理想化认知模型的方式分析了转喻的认知模式，并且解释了认知框架和凸显是决定转喻生成的两个关键因素。本文也通过将塞尔的言语行为理论、格赖斯的合作原则和斯珀伯和威尔逊的关联理论相结合，探讨了转喻在语用推理方面的功能。 通过本文关于转喻的研究，我们可以发现转喻的一种现象可通过不同理论进行解释。但是只是相关视角不同。通过各种理论对转喻进行解释具有某些特定优势，然而也具有一些明显劣势。因此，，本文除了通过心理学的扩散激活模型和认知语言学的理想化认知模型来分析转喻的认知模式，本文也介绍了一些语用学理论，例如语言行为理论、格莱斯理论以及其他更好理解转喻现象的关联理论。各种互相补充的理论可以更为全面地解释转喻在语用推理方面的功能。
[Abstract]:With the development of cognitive linguistics, metonymy is not only regarded as a rhetorical device, but also a basic way of thinking and action. This is a cognitive process in which people use prominent and important parts to represent the whole or a part of the whole, or choose the whole as a complete form to represent one of its parts. This paper describes metonymy from the perspective of cognitive and pragmatic linguistics, and discusses the cognitive and pragmatic motivation and pragmatic functions of metonymy. The author analyzes the cognitive model of metonymy by diffusion activation model and idealized cognitive model, and explains that cognitive framework and prominence are the two key factors that determine the generation of metonymy. This paper also discusses the function of metonymy in pragmatic reasoning by combining Searle's speech act theory, Grice's cooperative principle and Sperber's and Wilson's relevance theory. Through the study of metonymy in this paper, we can find that a phenomenon of metonymy can be explained by different theories. But only the relevant perspective is different. There are some specific advantages in explaining metonymy through various theories, but they also have some obvious disadvantages. Therefore, in addition to analyzing the cognitive model of metonymy through the diffusion activation model of psychology and the idealized cognitive model of cognitive linguistics, this paper also introduces some pragmatic theories, such as the theory of language behavior. Grice theory and other related theories that better understand metonymy phenomena. Various complementary theories can explain the function of metonymy in pragmatic reasoning more comprehensively.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H030
本文编号：2487136
[Abstract]:With the development of cognitive linguistics, metonymy is not only regarded as a rhetorical device, but also a basic way of thinking and action. This is a cognitive process in which people use prominent and important parts to represent the whole or a part of the whole, or choose the whole as a complete form to represent one of its parts. This paper describes metonymy from the perspective of cognitive and pragmatic linguistics, and discusses the cognitive and pragmatic motivation and pragmatic functions of metonymy. The author analyzes the cognitive model of metonymy by diffusion activation model and idealized cognitive model, and explains that cognitive framework and prominence are the two key factors that determine the generation of metonymy. This paper also discusses the function of metonymy in pragmatic reasoning by combining Searle's speech act theory, Grice's cooperative principle and Sperber's and Wilson's relevance theory. Through the study of metonymy in this paper, we can find that a phenomenon of metonymy can be explained by different theories. But only the relevant perspective is different. There are some specific advantages in explaining metonymy through various theories, but they also have some obvious disadvantages. Therefore, in addition to analyzing the cognitive model of metonymy through the diffusion activation model of psychology and the idealized cognitive model of cognitive linguistics, this paper also introduces some pragmatic theories, such as the theory of language behavior. Grice theory and other related theories that better understand metonymy phenomena. Various complementary theories can explain the function of metonymy in pragmatic reasoning more comprehensively.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H030
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈家煊;转指和转喻[J];当代语言学;1999年01期
2 潘震;曾文雄;;汉英名名复合词转喻连续体的接触强度及有界性[J];广西社会科学;2010年06期
3 徐存良;孙磊;;转喻在俄语政治语篇中的功能[J];外语研究;2009年04期
4 李勇忠;论语法转喻对语言结构的影响[J];外语教学与研究;2005年04期
5 张韧;;转喻的构式化表征[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2007年02期
6 徐盛桓;;基于模型的语用推理[J];外国语(上海外国语大学学报);2007年03期
7 赵彦春;关联理论对翻译的解释力[J];现代外语;1999年03期
8 刘正光;论转喻与隐喻的连续体关系[J];现代外语;2002年01期
9 王志坚;;俄语形容词名词化及其转喻思维[J];中国俄语教学;2010年04期
10 徐盛桓;;语用推理的认知研究[J];中国外语;2005年05期
本文编号：2487136
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2487136.html
