言据性的语类分布特征研究
发布时间：2025-01-10 23:43
言据性是指说话人对知识的来源以及可靠性的说明。它是一种很重要的语言机制,不仅关系到讲话者所提供的信息来源于何方,是否直接,是否可靠,而且还涉及到讲话者在话语活动中对相关信息所承担的责任。国外的言据性研究发展迅速,已逐渐成为语言学研究领域中的一个不可或缺的研究课题。在国内,也有不少学者关注过言据性问题,对言据性研究的部分成果做过简单的介绍与应用。不同的学者已经从功能语言学、隐喻、元话语、模糊限制语等角度研究了语篇的语类特征,但是从言据性角度研究语篇的语类特征却还不多。言据性具有很强的语类敏感性,言据性机制的应用体现不同语类的特征。本文从言据性的角度对比分析言据性标记在不同语类中的分布规律和使用差异,分析其原因。 基于有关言据性的研究和语类分析理论,借助语料库的研究手段,对言据性标记在四种语类中的使用情况进行了定量、定性的分析。借鉴胡壮麟(1994a)的修正模式,将言据性标记分为六类,建立了总统辩论,访谈,社论和学术论文四个语料库以及相应的附码系统,并对四个语料库中的言据性标记进行附码标注。采用语料库统计软件Concord300工具,统计出不同种类言据性标记在四个语料库中的分布情况,...
【文章页数】：119 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Abbreviations
List of Tables
List of Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Research background
1.2 Research significance and questions
1.3 Organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Studies on evidentiality
2.1.1 Chafe’s model of evidentiality
2.1.2 Willett’s model of evidentiality
2.1.3 Aikhenvald’s views on evidentiality
2.1.4 Hu’s model of evidentiality
2.1.5 The classification of evidentiality in this thesis
2.2 The study of evidentiality abroad
2.3 The study of evidentiality in China
2.4 The study of genre analysis abroad
2.5 The study of genre analysis in China
Chapter 3 Methodology
3.1 Research method
3.2 Data collection
Chapter 4 Analysis of Evidentiality in Each Genre
4.1 Evidentiality in presidential debate
4.1.1 Background information about presidential debate
4.1.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in presidential debate
4.1.3 The distribution of evidentiality across the moves of presidential debates
4.2 Evidentiality in interview
4.2.1 Background information about interviews
4.2.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in interview
4.2.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of interviews
4.3 Evidentiality in editorial
4.3.1 Background information about editorials
4.3.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in editorials
4.3.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of editorials
4.4 Evidentiality in research article
4.4.1 Background information about research articles
4.4.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in research articles
4.4.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of research articles
4.4.4 A comparative study of evidentiality between social science research articles and natural science research articles
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 A Comparative Study of Evidentiality in the Four Genres
5.1 A general analysis of evidentiality in the four genres
5.2 The distribution of evidentials in the main body of the four genres
5.3 The comparison of evidential distribution in spoken texts and written texts
5.3.1 A comparison between spoken texts and written texts
5.3.2 The distribution of evidentials in spoken texts and written texts
5.4 A pragmatic analysis of evidentials
5.4.1 Cooperative principle and politeness principle
5.4.2 A pragmatic analysis of evidentials
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Major findings and implications
6.2 Limitations and suggestions for further researches
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
作者简介
本文编号：4025610
【文章页数】：119 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
Abstract
Abbreviations
List of Tables
List of Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Research background
1.2 Research significance and questions
1.3 Organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
2.1 Studies on evidentiality
2.1.1 Chafe’s model of evidentiality
2.1.2 Willett’s model of evidentiality
2.1.3 Aikhenvald’s views on evidentiality
2.1.4 Hu’s model of evidentiality
2.1.5 The classification of evidentiality in this thesis
2.2 The study of evidentiality abroad
2.3 The study of evidentiality in China
2.4 The study of genre analysis abroad
2.5 The study of genre analysis in China
Chapter 3 Methodology
3.1 Research method
3.2 Data collection
Chapter 4 Analysis of Evidentiality in Each Genre
4.1 Evidentiality in presidential debate
4.1.1 Background information about presidential debate
4.1.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in presidential debate
4.1.3 The distribution of evidentiality across the moves of presidential debates
4.2 Evidentiality in interview
4.2.1 Background information about interviews
4.2.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in interview
4.2.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of interviews
4.3 Evidentiality in editorial
4.3.1 Background information about editorials
4.3.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in editorials
4.3.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of editorials
4.4 Evidentiality in research article
4.4.1 Background information about research articles
4.4.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in research articles
4.4.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of research articles
4.4.4 A comparative study of evidentiality between social science research articles and natural science research articles
4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 A Comparative Study of Evidentiality in the Four Genres
5.1 A general analysis of evidentiality in the four genres
5.2 The distribution of evidentials in the main body of the four genres
5.3 The comparison of evidential distribution in spoken texts and written texts
5.3.1 A comparison between spoken texts and written texts
5.3.2 The distribution of evidentials in spoken texts and written texts
5.4 A pragmatic analysis of evidentials
5.4.1 Cooperative principle and politeness principle
5.4.2 A pragmatic analysis of evidentials
5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
6.1 Major findings and implications
6.2 Limitations and suggestions for further researches
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
作者简介
本文编号：4025610
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/4025610.html
