All分裂构式的构式语法研究

发布时间：2018-01-27 10:16

本文关键词： all分裂构式假拟分裂构式构式语法形义对理据性　出处：《西南大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：All-分裂构式作为假拟分裂构式的一个重要次类,在分裂构式的研究中具有重要地位。以往对假拟分裂构式的研究中,对wh-分裂构式的研究比较多,而对all-分裂构式和the-分裂构式的关注较少。本研究基于对假拟分裂构式的已有探讨,尝试着对all-分裂构式进行重新分类,并对其句法语义特征及其形式和意义的来源进行探讨,以期为分裂构式和假拟分裂构式的整合研究提供依据。根据Collins(1991)对分裂构式和假拟分裂构式的定义,我们将all-分裂构式定义为:all-分裂构式作为一种断定构式,整个结构的前后段由一个“all”开头的关系小句和突出部分构成,通过系动词“be”连接,共同表达一种断定关系,其句法形式可以描述为“All+S+be+YP”。All-分裂构式大致分为三类:定指all-分裂构式、述谓all-分裂构式和同一型all-分裂构式。此外,在分析不同类别all-分裂构式所具有的语义内涵时,我们认为,all-分裂构式在语义上具有“存在性预设”。尤其是在定指all-分裂构式中,由于该构式本身包含对比焦点,从而赋予了该构式“排他性”的语义蕴含。根据以往对假拟分裂构式的形式和意义来源的假设,本文主要讨论了删除分析和问答对假设,通过历时研究,认为图式继承性原则和语义整合原则可为all-分裂构式的来源做出解释。本文认为,all-分裂构式作为断定构式的成员之一,继承了“断定”语义内涵,并且在句法特征上与其他断定构式的成员具有相似之处。在all-分裂构式的三种类型中,研究主要探讨了定指all-分裂构式,具体涉及“all”的功能、“be”的形式和“YP”的成分限制等句法问题以及“存在的预设”和“排他性语义蕴含”等语义问题。除此之外,在解释all-分裂构式句法意义来源时,“问答对”假设因其与all-分裂构式都包含对比焦点,而具有较强的解释力。并且,在历时研究的基础上,本文认为图式继承性原则和语义整合原则也可为all-分裂构式的形义来源做很好的解释。本文在Adele E.Goldberg构式语法理论的指导下,基于对语料库和已有研究成果的分析,将为完善假拟分裂构式的研究做出一定的贡献,同时也为构式研究提供了新思路,还为发现断定构式的共性,为整个断定构式的整合研究提供了依据。
[Abstract]:As an important subclass of pseudo-quasi-splitting constructions, All-splitting constructions play an important role in the study of splitting constructions. In the past, there are many researches on wh-splitting constructions. However, little attention has been paid to all-splitting constructions and the-splitting constructions. This study attempts to reclassify all-splitting constructions based on the existing study of pseudo-quasi-splitting constructions. The syntactic and semantic features, their forms and meanings are discussed. In order to provide the basis for the research on the integration of split and pseudo-pseudo-splitting constructions, according to the definition of splitting and pseudo-quasi-splitting constructions in Collins1991. We define the all-splitting construction as a kind of determinative construction. The front and rear sections of the whole structure are composed of a relative clause and a protruding part beginning with "all". By linking the link verb "be", a certain relationship is expressed together. Its syntactic form can be described as "All Sbe YP". In addition, when we analyze the semantic connotations of different types of all-splitting constructions, we think that. All-splitting constructions have "existential presupposition" in semantics, especially in all-splitting constructions, because the construction itself contains the contrastive focus. According to the previous hypotheses about the form and meaning source of pseudo-quasi-splitting construction, this paper mainly discusses the hypothesis of deletion analysis and question-and-answer pair, through diachronic research. It is believed that the inheritance principle of schema and the principle of semantic integration can explain the origin of all-splitting construction. It inherits the semantic connotations of "assertion" and has similarities with other members of the determinant in syntactic features, in the three types of all-splitting constructions. The study mainly discusses the all-splitting construction of definite finger, which involves the function of "all". The syntactic problems such as the form of "be" and the restriction of "YP", as well as the semantic problems such as "presupposition of existence" and "exclusive semantic implication". In explaining the syntactic meaning source of all-splitting construction, the "question-and-answer pair" hypothesis has a strong explanatory power because of its contrastive focus with all-splitting construction, and on the basis of diachronic research. This paper holds that the inheritance principle of schema and the principle of semantic integration can also provide a good explanation for the origin of the form and meaning of all-splitting construction. Under the guidance of E. Goldberg construction grammar theory. Based on the analysis of corpus and existing research results, it will make a certain contribution to improve the study of pseudo-quasi-splitting construction, but also provide a new way of thinking for the study of construction, but also for the discovery of the generality of the determinate construction. It provides the basis for the integration study of the whole determinative structure.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H146.3

【相似文献】