语篇性概念的内涵

发布时间：2018-03-14 14:00

本文选题：语篇性　切入点：内涵认知　出处：《外语学刊》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：语篇性作为语篇分析领域的核心概念,在学界已有过不少讨论,但其内涵意义尚未得到充分阐发。本文通过回顾和探究国内外有关语篇性概念的相关研究,得出以下结论:(1)要对语篇性概念的内涵进行充分阐析,须明确"经验性层面的语篇性"与"本体性层面的语篇性"的关系;(2)经验层面的语篇性相当于具体的语篇性标准,是复合概念,而本体层面的语篇性是抽象概念,故语篇性标准不等于语篇性本身;(3)语篇性标准(即经验层面的语篇性)能将隐而不显的语篇性昭示出来,反过来,本体层面的语篇性又能在语境中外化为具体的语篇性标准;(4)语篇性概念只有在其经验性与本体性的辩证关系中才能得到更好的理解。
[Abstract]:Discourse, as the core concept in the field of discourse analysis, has been discussed in academic circles, but its meaning has not been fully elucidated. This paper reviews and explores the relevant studies on the concept of discourse at home and abroad. We can draw the following conclusion: 1) in order to fully explain the connotation of the concept of discourse, we must make clear the relationship between "empiricism" and "textual" (the empirical level is equivalent to the standard of discourse). It is a compound concept, whereas discourse at the ontological level is an abstract concept. Therefore, the standard of discourse is not equal to the criterion of discourse itself. The criterion of textual character (i.e., the discourse of experience) can reveal the implicit and implicit discourse, and conversely, the standard of discourse is not equal to the criterion of discourse itself. Discourse at the ontological level can also be translated into a specific textual standard in the context of Chinese and foreign context. Only in the dialectical relationship between empiricism and ontology can the concept of discourse be better understood.
【作者单位】：东北师范大学;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究基金项目“语境的经验性与本体性关系研究”(16YJA740045)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：H05

【相似文献】