现代汉语规约性间接指责言语行为研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 09:47

本文选题：规约性间接言语行为　切入点：指责　出处：《华东师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：言语行为理论是语用学的重要理论之一,至今已发展为成熟的理论体系。言语行为中会遇到说话人的话语意图与语面意义不一致的情况,这便是间接言语行为。根据其间接语力与字面语力之间是否具有约定俗成的对应关系,间接言语行为可分成规约性间接言语行为与非规约性间接言语行为两类。然而,目前现代汉语对前者的研究远不如对后者的研究来得深入透彻,故我们将以现代汉语规约性间接指责言语行为为例,探究其语言形式与间接语力之间的对应规律。本文共分为五章:第一章从选题缘起出发,阐述了本文的研究对象与研究任务,对国内外学者的已有研究进行了述评。述评对象包括间接言语行为研究和现代汉语指责言语行为研究,在此基础上说明了本研究的意义、方法、语料来源及标注方式。第二章主要对"现代汉语规约性间接指责言语行为"的概念进行了界定。辨析了"指责""批评" "抱怨"的概念范畴,提出了指责言语行为的构成性规则,厘清了直接指责与间接指责、规约性间接指责与非规约性间接指责的分野,从而使研究对象更加明确。第三章在借鉴Searle(1975)的相关研究并重新调整研究路径的基础上,拟测出了现代汉语规约性间接指责的三类语力来源:询问受话人所表现的错误行状、询问受话人实施错误行状的理由、询问受话人改正错误行状的能力,并列举了每种类型语力来源的习用格式及相关语句。第四章从不同层面探讨了现代汉语规约性间接指责的语力实现方式,即那些习用格式如何借助其语言表现手段实现间接指责语力。发现反问句式是规约性间接指责习用格式的整体语用特征,间接指责语力均是由说话人对受话人行状的否定推导而出的,规约性间接指责的核心语用功能是降低对受话人的面子威胁。第五章概述了本研究的主要结论与研究价值,提出了研究过程中的不足之处,并展望了今后研究的开拓方向与愿景。
[Abstract]:Speech act theory, one of the most important theories in pragmatics, has been developed into a mature theoretical system. This is the indirect speech act. According to whether there is a common correspondence between the indirect speech force and the literal force, the indirect speech act can be divided into two categories: the conventional indirect speech act and the non-prescriptive indirect speech act. At present, the study of the former in modern Chinese is far less thorough than that in the latter. Therefore, we will take the case of indirect criticism of speech acts in modern Chinese as an example. This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter, from the origin of the topic, describes the research object and task of this paper. This paper reviews the existing researches of scholars at home and abroad, including indirect speech act research and modern Chinese reproach speech act research. On this basis, it explains the significance and method of this study. The second chapter mainly defines the concept of "indirect accusation speech act" in modern Chinese, and discriminates the conceptual category of "criticism" and "complaint". This paper puts forward the constitutive rules of verbal acts of reproach, and clarifies the distinction between direct and indirect accusations, and between prescriptive indirect accusations and non-statutory indirect accusations. The third chapter, on the basis of drawing lessons from the relevant research of Searleian 1975and readjusting the research path, tries to find out the three kinds of language force sources of indirect criticism in modern Chinese: inquiring the wrong behavior of the addressee. Asking the recipient the reason for the wrong line, asking the recipient about his ability to correct the wrong line, The author also lists the idiomatic forms and relevant sentences of each type of language force source. Chapter four discusses the realization of language force from different aspects of indirect accusation of statutory nature in modern Chinese. That is, how the idiomatic forms use their linguistic expressions to achieve indirect criticism. It is found that the rhetorical questioning is the overall pragmatic feature of the conventional forms of indirect criticism. The indirect accusation force is derived from the speaker's negation of the recipient's behavior. The core pragmatic function of the statutory indirect accusation is to reduce the face threat to the addressee. Chapter five summarizes the main conclusions and the research value of this study. The inadequacies of the research process are put forward, and the developing direction and vision of the future research are prospected.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】