汉语和藻敏瑶语名量词对比研究

发布时间：2018-04-18 09:26

本文选题：藻敏瑶语 + 汉语　；参考：《广西民族大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：藻敏瑶语和汉语都是汉藏语系中名量词比较丰富的语言。目前对汉语名量词的研究已经非常深入,取得了丰富的研究成果,而藻敏瑶语名量词的研究则起步较晚,尚处于研究的初始阶段。本文在田野调查的基础上,根据结构主义语言学理论对汉语和藻敏瑶语名量词的相关语法进行细致描写总结和对比,又根据功能语言学理论对汉语和藻敏瑶语名量词语义、语用进行了多角度的对比研究,系统的分析对比了两种语言名量词不同的特点。在语法功能上,藻敏瑶语名量词能够与数词、指示代词、形容词和名词组合搭配,并且形成的短语结构固化程度较高,而汉语名量词只能跟数词和指示代词进行组合搭配,形成的短语结构更为松散。同时在单独充当句法成分的能力上,藻敏瑶语名量词比汉语名量词更强。在语义功能上,藻敏瑶语名量词分类功能和摹状功能并举,但和其他苗瑶语族语言不同,是从语义上对名词进行分类,而汉语名量词则摹状功能较强。在语用功能上,藻敏瑶语名量词和数量短语单独作句子成分是有指和实指,单个量词则不定指,但数量短语单独作句子成分和名量词单独修饰名词的时候是定指。而汉语数量短语单独作句子成分时则是有指、实指和不定指。
[Abstract]:Both Zao Min Yao language and Chinese language are rich in Noun quantifiers in Chinese and Tibetan languages.At present, the research on Chinese noun classifiers has been very deep, and has made rich research results, while the study of Zao Min Yao Noun quantifiers has started late and is still in the initial stage of research.On the basis of field investigation, this paper summarizes and compares the relevant grammar of Chinese and Zao Min Yao Noun classifiers according to the theory of structuralist linguistics, and according to the theory of functional linguistics, it also makes a detailed description and comparison of Chinese and Zao Min Yao Noun classifiers.This paper makes a contrastive study of pragmatics from various angles, and systematically analyzes and compares the different features of the two languages' noun classifiers.In terms of grammatical functions, the nominal quantifiers in Zao Min Yao language can be collocated with numerals, demonstrative pronouns, adjectives and nouns, and the structure of the phrases formed is highly solidified, while the Chinese nominal-classifiers can only be combined with numerals and demonstrative pronouns.The resulting phrase structure is looser.At the same time, the ability of acting as syntactic component alone, Zao Min Yao Noun classifier is stronger than Chinese Noun classifier.In terms of semantic function, the classifying function and description function of nominal classifiers in Zao Min Yao language are combined, but different from other Miao Yao languages, nouns are classified semantically, while Chinese nominal classifiers have strong description function.In terms of pragmatic functions, noun quantifiers and quantitative phrases in Zao Min Yao language are used as reference and actual reference, while single quantifier is indefinite, but quantitative phrase is fixed when they are used as sentence components and nominal quantifiers to modify nouns separately.When Chinese quantitative phrases are used as sentence components alone, they are signified, real and indefinite.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：H146.2;H251

【参考文献】