话语的结构与意义及话语分析的应用

发布时间：2018-05-04 12:35

本文选题：话语类型 + 话语单位　；参考：《当代修辞学》2017年02期

【摘要】：话语分析的典型对象是比句子大的语言成分,主要特点是密切联系语言的使用环境。以何种语言单位作为话语篇章的基本组成部分,没有一个确定的答案。一般以句子为其基本单位,但根据话语类型和研究目的,也可以是句子之外的其他语言成分。判断句与非句使用的是语法标准。判断话语和非话语,除了早期的Zellig Harris等使用形式标准之外,现在一般都根据成分之间是否具备连贯性这个意义标准。连贯性是语言信息流的重要属性,本文讨论它在话语组织中的主要表现手段。话语分析作为一种研究方法,不但用来研究语言本体成分的形式和意义,也用来研究话语篇章表现的社会、文化和政治意义。批判性话语分析理论就是这方面的重要代表。侧重语言本体研究的话语分析和侧重语言社会、文化和政治意义的话语分析两者之间有何异同,本文作了简要分析。
[Abstract]:The typical object of discourse analysis is the language component which is larger than the sentence, and its main feature is that it is closely related to the environment in which the language is used. There is no definite answer as to which language unit is the basic part of discourse. Sentences are generally taken as their basic units, but they can also be language components other than sentences, depending on the type of utterance and the purpose of the study. Judging sentences and non-sentences use grammatical standards. In order to judge utterance and non-utterance, except for the early Zellig Harris standard, it is generally based on the meaning criterion of coherence between components. Coherence is an important attribute of language information flow. Discourse analysis, as a research method, is used not only to study the form and meaning of linguistic Noumenon, but also to study the social, cultural and political significance of discourse discourse. Critical discourse analysis theory is an important representative of this aspect. This paper makes a brief analysis of the similarities and differences between the discourse analysis which focuses on the linguistic ontology and the discourse analysis which focuses on the linguistic society, culture and political meaning.
【作者单位】：澳大利亚昆士兰大学语言与文化学院;
【分类号】：H05

【相似文献】