当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 语言艺术论文 >

衡阳方言比喻句式研究

发布时间:2018-05-26 00:37

  本文选题:衡阳方言 + 比喻句 ; 参考:《云南师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:本文以衡阳方言比喻句为研究对象,运用文献资料法、田野调查法、系统分析法等多种方法,广泛搜集语言事实,并对丰富的语言事实进行认真的描写,运用统计分析、比较和归纳的方法,从不同的角度对衡阳方言的比喻句式进行分析研究。正文一共分为以下六个部分。绪论部分。概述了衡阳城市情况、衡阳方言情况,相关领域的研究现状。基于衡阳方言比喻句式研究的薄弱,因此本论文试图运用文献法与田野调查法对衡阳方言比喻句式进行较为系统的探讨。由于衡阳方言类的文本资料较少,因此本文大部分都是以方言口语为研究语料,本文重点是对一些有典型性、有代表性的比喻句语料进行归纳分析,从中发现并总结出衡阳方言比喻句在日常使用上的一些规律。第一章,较全面地总结了衡阳方言比喻句中的比喻要素,从本体、喻体选择、比喻词选择和相似点选择四个方面来分析比喻要素。从喻体类型与喻体特征两个方面来分析喻体的选择。喻体选择总结出衡阳方言比喻句的喻体主要类型有动植物类、饮食类、生产生活类、身体器官类和地方特色类五种。同时总结出喻体特征主要有鲜明地域性、世俗鄙琐性、相对稳定性、直观世俗性、模糊意象性五种。比喻词选择则从明喻和暗喻两个大类上来分析喻词的选择。衡阳方言比喻句相似点从显性和隐性两个角度进行分析总结。第二章,重点分析了衡阳方言比喻句的基本结构和辞格结构。根据比喻三大基本类型,即明喻、暗喻、借喻,对衡阳方言比喻句的结构进行总结分析。明喻比喻句从主谓式、偏正式两种类型去总结分析;暗喻从主谓式、偏正式两种类型去总结分析;借喻则是从方言词语喻体、熟语喻体和句子喻体三种喻体类型上举例说明。第三章,探析衡阳方言比喻句变式类型。对衡阳方言比喻句中特殊的较喻、倒喻、否喻和博喻四种比喻变式进行探析。较喻从强喻、弱喻、等喻三个类型去分析,强喻、弱喻、等喻中又分别总结出不同的句式结构。倒喻也总结了两个不同的句式结构。否喻则概括为肯定本体、否定喻体和否定喻体、肯定本体两种结构情况。博喻则总结出喻体完全不同和在前一喻体的基础上补充两大类。第四章,论文以夸喻、拟喻、通感与比喻兼用三种情况来总结分析衡阳方言比喻句修辞综合运用,夸喻与拟喻都是以兼用与连用的使用情况划分,也对衡阳方言比喻句中这三种辞格综合运用情况进行了总结划分并具体分析。总结全文。对全文研究内容进行概括梳理,反思行文中的不足之处,对下一阶段的研究提出展望。
[Abstract]:Taking the figurative sentence of Hengyang dialect as the object of study, this paper uses the methods of literature, field investigation, system analysis and other methods to collect the linguistic facts extensively, and describes the rich linguistic facts carefully and makes use of statistical analysis. The comparative and inductive methods are used to analyze the figurative sentence patterns of Hengyang dialect from different angles. The text is divided into the following six parts. Introduction. Summarized Hengyang city situation, Hengyang dialect situation, related field research status. Based on the weak study of the figurative sentence pattern in Hengyang dialect, this paper attempts to make a systematic study of the metaphorical sentence pattern in Hengyang dialect by using literature and field investigation. Because of the lack of textual data of Hengyang dialect, most of this paper is based on the spoken language of dialect. The emphasis of this paper is to sum up and analyze some typical and representative metaphorical sentence materials. Find and summarize some rules of Hengyang dialect metaphorical sentence in daily use. The first chapter summarizes the metaphorical elements in Hengyang dialect and analyzes the metaphorical elements from four aspects: Noumenon, vehicle selection, metaphorical choice and similarity selection. The choice of the vehicle is analyzed from two aspects: the type of the vehicle and the characteristics of the vehicle. The main types of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect are animal and plant, diet, production and life, body organs and local characteristics. At the same time, it concludes that there are five main characteristics of the vehicle: regional, secular, relatively stable, intuitive and secular, fuzzy image. The choice of metaphorical words is analyzed from two categories: metonymy and metonymy. The similarities of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect are analyzed and summarized from two angles: explicit and recessive. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of Hengyang dialect figurative sentence basic structure and rhetorical structure. According to the three basic types of metaphor, that is, similes, metaphors and metaphors, the structure of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect is summarized and analyzed. Metonymy metaphorical sentences are summed up and analyzed from subject-predicate type, partial formal two types; metonymy from subject-predicate type, partial formal two types to sum up and analyze; metonymy is illustrated by examples from three types of dialect words and expressions, idiomatic vehicles and sentence metaphors. The third chapter, analyzes the Hengyang dialect metaphorical sentence variant type. This paper probes into the special metaphorical, inverted, non-metonymy and Boyu metaphorical variations in the figurative sentences of Hengyang dialect. There are three types of metonymy: strong metaphor, weak metaphor, and so on. Inverted metaphors also sum up two different sentence structures. Non-metaphor is summed up as positive Noumenon, negation, affirmation of Noumenon. Boyu sums up two categories: completely different vehicles and two kinds of supplement on the basis of the former one. In the fourth chapter, the thesis summarizes and analyzes the comprehensive use of figurative sentences in Hengyang dialect by using three kinds of cases: Kua Yu, pseudonymy, synaesthesia and metaphor. It also summarizes and classifies the comprehensive application of these three rhetorical cases in the figurative sentences of Hengyang dialect and analyzes them concretely. Summary of the full text. This paper summarizes the content of the full text, reflects on the shortcomings of the text, and puts forward a prospect for the next stage of the study.
【学位授予单位】:云南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:H174

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 蒋纯捷;衡阳方言中的“满”[J];高等函授学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年02期

2 彭兰玉;衡阳方言的语气词[J];方言;2003年02期

3 申莹莹;;衡阳方言中的否定词[J];语文学刊;2010年05期

4 刘伟民;衡阳方言的“下”字[J];湖南省政法管理干部学院学报;2002年S2期

5 阿兰·佩罗贝 ,洛朗·沙加尔 ,罗仁携;《衡阳方言》评介[J];湘潭大学学报(社会科学版);1987年04期

6 陈媛媛;;衡阳方言中的“哒”[J];消费导刊;2008年06期

7 唐艳;;衡阳方言谚语与当地农业生产文化特征探究[J];大众文艺(理论);2009年17期

8 李亚娜;;衡阳方言谚语与当地地域文化[J];时代文学(下半月);2014年01期

9 曾春花;李成兵;;湖南衡阳方言副词论略[J];现代语文(语言研究版);2008年05期

10 彭兰玉;衡阳方言的程度表示法[J];衡阳师范学院学报(社会科学);2003年01期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 彭兰玉;衡阳方言语法研究[D];湖南师范大学;2002年

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 唐茜;衡阳方言比喻句式研究[D];云南师范大学;2017年

2 谢红;衡阳方言常用量词的变异与变化研究[D];湘潭大学;2016年

3 李晖旭;衡阳方言青少年语音的社会语言学研究[D];湖南师范大学;2007年

4 黄玉莲;衡阳方言假声研究[D];湖南大学;2013年

5 申莹莹;衡阳方言副词研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2011年

6 张艳;衡阳方言的亲昵称谓语和冒犯称谓语研究[D];湖南师范大学;2013年

7 肖潇;衡阳方言中的古入声字研究[D];西南民族大学;2013年

8 刘静;衡阳和湘潭市区方言声调实验研究[D];湖南师范大学;2010年



本文编号:1935266

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/1935266.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户de4f7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com