评价理论视角下有关南海争端的官方话语分析

发布时间：2018-06-02 16:16

本文选题：南海问题 + 官方话语　；参考：《暨南大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：南海问题是中国与南海周边国家关系中一个重要问题。近几年来南海争端愈演愈烈,这种趋势与我国国家利益背道而驰。有关南海争端的官方话语不仅引导着国内舆论导向,更是向国际社会传递我国政府立场和态度的最重要渠道,对于我国在南海争端中占据话语主动权起着关键作用。文章主体部分首先对不同的官方话语进行分类,从评价理论入手,分析官方话语话语所体现出来的情感和态度;紧接着分析官方话语的介入系统,探究如何利用介入资源与听众进行协商进而实现评价性和说服性;然后,分析官方话语的级差系统,结合语用学相关理论分析官方话语态度的强弱。结语部分通过得到的研究数据,结合南海问题发展的不同状况,对官方话语在其话语主题、词汇选择进行研究,同时分析不同时期的历时变化总结出有关南海争端官方话语的话语模式,同时为中国在南海争端中争取话语主动权提出相关建议。通过对官方话语进行的系统分析,发现评价理论在中态度系统使用的频率最高,其次是介入和级差;整体上看,肯定的态度资源使用大于否定,只有外交部发言人这一官方话语类别中,否定的评价多于肯定的评价;有关的官方话语使用的语用策略一直以来基本没有变化。
[Abstract]:The issue of the South China Sea is an important issue in the relations between China and the neighboring countries in the South China Sea. In recent years, the South China Sea dispute intensified, this trend runs counter to our national interests. The official discourse about the South China Sea dispute not only guides the domestic public opinion, but also conveys the position and attitude of our government to the international community. It plays a key role in the discourse initiative of our country in the South China Sea dispute. The main part of the article first classifies the different official discourse, analyzes the emotion and attitude of the official discourse from the evaluation theory, and then analyzes the intervention system of the official discourse. This paper explores how to use the intervention resources to negotiate with the audience in order to achieve evaluation and persuasion; then analyzes the differential system of official discourse and analyzes the strength and weakness of official discourse attitude combined with the relevant theories of pragmatics. In the conclusion part, according to the research data and the different development situation of the South China Sea problem, the author studies the topic of official discourse and the choice of vocabulary. At the same time, it analyzes the diachronic changes in different periods and summarizes the discourse patterns of the official discourse of the South China Sea dispute, and puts forward some relevant suggestions for China to fight for the discourse initiative in the South China Sea dispute. Through the systematic analysis of official discourse, it is found that the evaluation theory is the most frequently used in the medium attitude system, followed by intervention and difference. On the whole, the positive attitude resources are used more than the negative ones. Only in the official discourse category of Foreign Ministry spokesman, the negative comments are more than the positive ones, and the pragmatic strategies used in official discourse have remained unchanged.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H15

【相似文献】